Premium
This is an archive article published on April 9, 2011

Sonawane murder: CBI files case against 11

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Friday registered a case against 11 persons for burning alive Malegaon additional collector Yashwant Sonawane.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Friday registered a case against 11 persons for burning alive Malegaon additional collector Yashwant Sonawane. The accused include Popat Shinde who suffered 70 per cent burns in the incident and died a few days later.

Sources said the line of investigation remained the same as that of Manmad police and the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) Act had not been applied at present. According to the FIR,the incident is believed to have happened after 1 pm on on January 25. Sonawane had stopped the vehicle near the site of crime on his way back from an official visit to Panewadi after he spotted “some suspicious activity” behind a dhaba.

The prosecution said a scuffle ensued between Popat and Sonawane,after which the accused hit the Additional Collector with an iron rod. More members of Shinde family and accomplices joined in beating Sonawane soon while his driver and personal assistant went in Sonawane’s official car to the nearest police station. The police,on reaching the spot,found the burnt body of Sonawane and an empty 20-litre kerosene container at the spot later. The CBI case has been registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for murder and preventing a government servant from performing his official duty.

Meanwhile,unaware of the development,two Mumbai residents — Madansigh Rajmuradsingh of Bhiwandi and Dhiraj Yewale of Vidyavihar — moved the Bombay High Court after they were named “proposed accused” in the case. They contended that they were in no way involved in the murder and demanded that their names should be deleted from the FIR registered by the Manmad police.

Yewale said in his petition that he was involved in criminal offences prior to 2004 but has reformed since and now does social work in Jalgaon. He said he could not be implicated under the stringent MCOCA as he had not been chargesheeted in any offence in the past ten years.

The Nashik police had named the petitioners for the first time in a proposal forwarded to Inspector General of Police,Nashik on February 3,2011,seeking sanction to invoke MCOCA provisions in the case. A division bench of Justices P V Hardas and MN Gilani,on Friday,directed the state government to file an affidavit in reply to the petitions before adjourning the case till April 21.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement