Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Murder accused moves Mumbai court against Ujjwal Nikam’s reinstatement as special public prosecutor
Murder accused Vijay Palande claimed that Ujjwal Nikam, who unsuccessfully contested the Lok Sabha elections on a BJP ticket, may go to any extent to get a false conviction in high-profile cases to bolster the party’s image.

A murder accused has approached a Mumbai sessions court against advocate Ujjwal Nikam’s reinstatement as a special public prosecutor (SPP) and requested that he be kept away from the case “in the interest of justice and fundamental rights”. Nikam had recently contested the Lok Sabha elections as a BJP candidate.
A day before his name was declared as the BJP candidate for the Mumbai North Central Lok Sabha seat, Nikam had resigned from 29 pending cases, including the 26/11 Mumbai attack trial where he was appointed as SPP. After he lost the seat, the Maharashtra government earlier this month re-appointed Nikam as SPP in the said cases.
On Monday, Vijay Bhivajirao Palande, who was booked in 2012 for allegedly murdering Arunkumar Tikku, the father of an actor in Mumbai’s Oshiwara, filed an application in the sessions court seeking an order “to keep Nikam away” from the case. Palande claimed that Nikam’s reappointment was against the law and public interest and sought cancellation of the same and a fresh appointment in the case.
Palande claimed that Nikam would act to further the BJP’s agenda and alleged that he may go to any extent to get a false conviction in high-profile cases to bolster the party’s image. This, Palande said, was against the fundamental rights of the accused and his expectation of fairness.
“The fresh appointment of Nikam by BJP-led government in the state is for extraneous consideration, made with malafide intention to promote him and to make campaign through him as well as to give him hefty remunerations and facilities in (the) name of legal fees which is public money and this is favouritism and same is illegal,” the application stated.
“Nikam is not fair about the present case and is prejudiced and has a malafide intention against the applicant,” Palande claimed in his plea, which is likely to come up on June 28.