skip to content
Advertisement
Premium

Missing young MLAs: Only 10 MLAs under the age of 35 in state Assembly and 57 under the age of 45

All these 10 MLAs come from political families

Be sensitive towards demands of job aspirants: Sharad Pawar to Maharashtra govtA day after staging a protest in Pune, the job aspirants met Pawar on Saturday and conveyed their grievances about academic challenges and recent administrative decisions (File Photo)

On Sunday, the NCP (SP) led by Sharad Pawar appointed 25-year-old Rohit Patil, the youngest MLA in the Maharashtra State Assembly, as the party’s Chief Whip.

Patil’s appointment is, however, an anomaly in Maharashtra’s polity which is seeing an increasing reduction of young individuals in the state’s Legislative Assembly.

Maharashtra’s 15th Legislative Assembly has only 57 MLAs in the age group of 25-45. This is the lowest representation for this demography since the early 70s.

Story continues below this ad

According to the 2011 Census, Maharashtra has a population of approximately 11.23 crore, with the 25-45 age group comprising 41 per cent of the state’s total population. However, this age group accounts for just 19.79 per cent of the elected representatives in the 15th Legislative Assembly.

This significant decline points to a glaring gap between the growing youth demographic and their underrepresentation in the political arena. The disparity is even more pronounced for MLAs under the age of 35, with only 10 such representatives in the current Assembly — the fewest ever in Maharashtra’s history.

While individuals below 35 constitute 62.81 per cent of the state’s population, their political representation is a mere 3.47 per cent. Notably, there are only two MLAs under the age of 30 — Patil and Karan Deotale, a BJP MLA from Warora.

The representation of the 46-55 age group in the Maharashtra State Assembly has remained relatively stable, with this group comprising 9.75 per cent of the state’s population and holding 36.45% of the Assembly’s seats, with 105 MLAs. In contrast, certain age groups are significantly overrepresented relative to their share of the population.

Story continues below this ad

Notably, the 56-65 age group, which makes up only 6.7 per cent of the state’s population, accounts for 32.29 per cent of the Assembly’s composition, with 93 MLAs.

Similarly, the 66-75 age group, representing 4.65 per cent of the population, holds 11.11 per cent of the seats, with 32 MLAs.

The number of MLAs in these age groups has grown substantially compared to previous Assemblies, with the 15th Maharashtra Legislative Assembly having the highest-ever number of representatives in these two age categories. Interestingly almost all of the 10 MLAs under the age of 35 in the current legislature come from political lineages.

“In today’s political landscape, most young politicians who make a mark are from well-established political families. The current first-past-the-post electoral system tends to favor entrenched figures over fresh faces. To address this, there is a strong case for overhauling the electoral system, potentially implementing a quota for younger age groups, especially those under 30,” said Talha Sheikh, 27, Secretary of the Nashik unit of the Communist Party of India (CPI).

Story continues below this ad

The decline of student politics in Maharashtra, which was instrumental in shaping political ideologies and producing leaders in the 60s and 70s, has also contributed to the decreasing representation of young people in politics.

“Given the economic power and social influence required to win elections, most political parties are hesitant to give tickets to young candidates. While this is a concern for representative democracies, it’s an unfortunate reality in Indian politics, and I believe the situation will only worsen in the future,” said a senior Congress leader, on condition of anonymity

 

Declining number of Young MLAs
25-35 36-45 Total     25-45 Total MLAs in assembly % of MLAs in 25-45
1972 34 112 146 270 54.1
1978 26 80 106 288 36.8
1980 55 88 143 288 49.7
1985 30 98 128 288 44.4
1990 28 104 132 288 45.8
1995 31 105 136 288 47.2
1999 20 90 110 288 38.2
2004 23 81 104 288 36.1
2009 19 75 94 288 32.6
2014 15 83 98 288 34.0
2019 15 65 80 288 27.8
2024 10 47 57 288 19.8

 

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement