Govt’s Language Advisory Committee to oppose introduction of Hindi in primary education

Further highlighting that it is worse to make Hindi as the default third language in schools, Deshmukh said, “Imposition of Hindi is not only confusing to children but is also a cultural onslaught. Even though they use the same script, there are major variations in the way these two languages are written. Starting from grammar rules, use of punctuation marks, sentence structures and even meanings of words, there are major differences. For example, the word ‘shiksha’ in Hindi means education, but in Marathi, it means punishment. This confusion at the early stage of learning a language can impact the quality of language education.”

Deshmukh stated that the committee has also decided to take part in the protest against Hindi as a third language, called by the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena on July 5.

“The government is citing National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 for these changes, which actually emphasizes the importance of education in the mother tongue. The National Curriculum Framework (NCF) brings third language only from Class 6, raising questions on the state’s purpose to bring third language from Class 1,” said Deshmukh while adding that the government should rather work on improving the quality of language education in state-run schools.