Premium
This is an archive article published on August 15, 2021

Ex-MLA files application over HC suggestion against cigarettes sale during Covid pandemic

"It will be impossible for the thousands of women workers to survive as their livelihood is solely dependent on sale of bidis," states the application.

Maharashtra cingaretter ban, bidi manufacturing, Bombay high court, solapur, Covid-19, Indian express, indian express news, Mumbai newsSuggesting a temporary ban on sale of cigarettes and bidis during the pandemic, a division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Girish S Kulkarni on April 22 had sought a response from the Centre and state government.(Representational)

Former MLA Narsayya Adam, advisor of a trade union representing nearly 70,000 women workers associated with manufacturing of bidis from Solapur, recently moved an intervention application in the Bombay High Court against the court’s suggestion of a temporary ban on sale of cigarettes and bidis during the pandemic.

The application, filed by Adam and Mahamadgaus Shaikh, general secretary of the union, through advocate Sarang Aradhye last month, sought permission to intervene in the PIL by city-based lawyer Sneha Marjadi alleging improper Covid-19 management in Maharashtra.

This comes after the HC had sought to know from the state government its opinion on the steps to be taken on a report by experts that indicated that cigarette and bidi smokers are more vulnerable to Covid-19.

The application states that if any adverse orders are passed in the matter, “it will be impossible for the thousands of women workers to survive as their livelihood is solely dependent on sale of bidis”, and there is “absence of material including research about Covid-19 victims addicted to smoking”. Therefore, it was necessary to hear the petitioners before passing any such directions.

Suggesting a temporary ban on sale of cigarettes and bidis during the pandemic, a division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Girish S Kulkarni on April 22 had sought a response from the Centre and state government. The court had said it was of the opinion of consideration of such a ban by the governments as the Covid-19 virus affects the lungs and weak lungs are severely affected.

The applicants stated that the bidi manufacturing business started 150 years ago and in Solapur city alone, there are 70,000 women employees having exclusive mode of earning through the same, and there are nearly 5 lakh workers associated with the said business, who will get affected if such a decision is taken by the government.

“If any adverse action is taken and if sale of bidi and cigarettes is banned during pandemic, serious harm and prejudice would be caused to the workers whose bread and butter is dependent on said business… The court may direct the petitioner to implead the applicants as party respondent in the PIL,” the application said.

Story continues below this ad

Intervention applications were also moved by Mumbai Bidi Tambaku Vyapari Sangh and Federation of Retailers Association, opposing a ban or prohibition on smoking and sale of cigarettes and bidis.

In June this year, the state government had submitted a June 15 report by Dr Rajendra Badwe, director of Tata Memorial Centre, which referred to several researches and worldwide studies indicating that smokers are likely to be more prone to Covid-19 infection.

However, the state had told the HC that it was not contemplating any such drastic step of ‘blanket order’ at present stage.

The HC will hear the plea in due course.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement