Premium
This is an archive article published on March 18, 2020

Bomaby HC imposes cost of Rs 15,000 on litigant for ‘unnecessary listing’ of case

A single-judge bench of justice Gautam S Patel passed the order Monday while hearing the petition of one Chandrakant Mulchand Shah seeking relief from Jiraj Developers LLP.

Bombay HC to hear only urgent matters from March 16 in view of COVID-19 The bench remarked that either the facility extended to the lawyers can be withdrawn or costs imposed. (File Photo)

The Bombay High Court has imposed a fine of Rs 15,000 on a petitioner while observing that listing and mentioning the plea was “thoroughly irresponsible” as there was no urgency despite the high court administration’s directions to restrict proceedings only for urgent matters.

A single-judge bench of justice Gautam S Patel passed the order Monday while hearing the petition of one Chandrakant Mulchand Shah seeking relief from Jiraj Developers LLP. It said that lawyers could not have possibly advised the parties that the matter could be listed, especially in view of restrictions notified by the acting chief justice on March 14. The HC had issued a notification on March 14, whereby it restricted its functioning to urgent matters. Advocates and litigants were also directed to mention matters showing urgency which would be heard as per the satisfaction of the court.

“The present listing for ad-interim reliefs is thoroughly irresponsible. It is a regular contempt motion and there can be no urgency in this,” the bench observed Monday. Justice Patel also noted that he had issued a notice stating that parties are allowed to put in praecipes for cases that are truly urgent. The notice also mentioned that costs may be imposed if no urgency is found.

Story continues below this ad

The bench remarked that either the facility extended to the lawyers can be withdrawn or costs imposed. “That is preferable because other lawyers at least will not be inconvenienced,” it said.

Advocate Gauraj Shah, appearing for the petitioner, claimed that he had advised the client not to insist on mentioning, but he did not listened. “That is no answer. It is not unreasonable to expect advocates to inform their clients of what is and is not possible or permissible, and not to act on their every wish,” justice Patel noted. While imposing Rs 15, 000 cost on the petitioner, the bench said that matter will be heard on June 26 and no priority listing will be provided.

Referring to the cost imposed on the petitioner in the matter, advocate Sujay Kantawala said, “I welcome the imposition of costs. In the next case, it should be Rs 1 lakh. Litigants cannot take the directives issued by the acting Chief Justice lightly in light of the seriousness of this pandemic we are all facing.”

The Bombay High Court administration has reduced working hours and directed lawyers and its staff to ensure de-congestion in view of the coronavirus outbreak. High court judge Anil K Menon has also issued a notice that highly urgent matters will be taken up for mentioning by video conferencing through a mobile application on court working days.

Story continues below this ad

“Advocates and parties in person may mention urgent matters through the unit installed in court room number 16-B or they may join the video conference room remotely from their office or home using the link and PIN to be shared with them on the e-mail ID provided by them.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement