‘Equal pay for equal work’: Telangana High Court to review wage dispute for outsourced employees
The Telangana government contended that the writ court failed to consider the distinct nature of the employees’ engagement and issued a ‘general order’ without a case-by-case review.
Written by Rahul V Pisharody
Hyderabad | September 12, 2025 09:45 PM IST
3 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
To resolve the conflicting submissions and verify the lower court’s decision, the high court has found it “appropriate to call for the writ court’s records.”
The Telangana High Court Friday agreed to hear and called for records in a case concerning the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ for 49 part-time and outsourced government employees. The order, issued by a division bench of Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G M Mohiuddin, comes in response to an appeal filed by the state government against a writ court’s directive.
The case centres on a group of respondents, some of whom have been part-time contingent workers since as far back as 1984, while others are outsourced employees engaged in sweeping work in various police stations since 2006. The employees approached the writ court for payment and allowances reserved for regular employees, from the date of their initial appointment till date.
They sought the application of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ and relied upon the judgment of the apex court in the ‘State of Punjab V. Jagjit Singh’ case.
Story continues below this ad
According to the appellant, the outsourced part-time workers were being paid remuneration, which was revised from time to time as per the Government Orders applicable to such cases till 2016.
“The writ court was of the view that since the respondents are rendering part-time services with their work hours ranging four to six hours, in view of the ratio in Jagjit Singh’s case (supra), they are entitled to be paid the wages equivalent to the minimum of the pay scale of last grade service as per the extant pay scales,” the division bench noted.
The counsel for the appellant contended that the writ court failed to consider the distinct nature of the employees’ engagement, as either outsourced or part-time contingent workers, and issued a “general order” without a case-by-case review.
The counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents have duly enclosed the relevant documents relating to their engagement over the period of time.
Story continues below this ad
“The writ court has, after taking note of the averments and the supporting documents, rightly came to the conclusion that all the respondents are entitled to (the) minimum pay scale of last grade service as per the extant pay scales. The said documents have not been enclosed in the memo of appeal,” the bench observed.
To resolve the conflicting submissions and verify the lower court’s decision, the high court has found it “appropriate to call for the writ court’s records.” The case is now scheduled to be heard on September 17.
Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More