Premium
This is an archive article published on August 2, 2012

BMW hit-and-run case: SC acquits three co-accused

The Supreme Court acquitted a Delhi-based businessman and his two employees,sentenced to varying jail terms for tampering with evidence in the 1999 BMW hit-and-run case,which involved former Naval chief Admiral S M Nanda’s grandson Sanjeev Nanda.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday acquitted a Delhi-based businessman and his two employees,sentenced to varying jail terms for tampering with evidence in the 1999 BMW hit-and-run case,which involved former Naval chief Admiral S M Nanda’s grandson Sanjeev Nanda.

A bench of Justices Deepak Verma and K S Radhakrishnan set aside the trial court and the Delhi High Court’s concurring verdicts that had convicted businessman Rajeev Gupta and his two employees Bhola Nath and Shyam Singh. Gupta was sentenced to six months in jail while his employees were awarded three-month imprisonment.

The court underlined severe discrepancies in the investigation and said that the case against the trio could not be established beyond reasonable doubts due to the inadequacy of the incriminating materials against them.

“No credible evidence was recorded by the prosecution to show who washed the (BMW) car (immediately after the accident to remove blood stains),” said the bench. It also questioned as to why did the Delhi Police not lift fingerprints from the car to establish who had tried to destroy the evidence.

The apex court has already reserved its verdict on an appeal by the Delhi Police against the Delhi High Court order,which had reduced Sanjeev Nanda’s sentence from five years to two years.

The Delhi High Court had in July 2009 reduced Nanda’s sentence from five to two years in jail after holding he could not have had the knowledge that the tragedy could strike by his rash and negligent driving. Nanda was behind the wheels when he had mowed down six persons,including three policemen,with his BMW car on January 10,1999. The court had modified the trial court’s order by holding him guilty under Section 304-A (causing death due to rash and negligent act) and acquitting him of Section 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement