Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Squarely blaming Punjab government for the ramshackle construction in the periphery,the Chandigarh Administration has said that the decision of Punjab to develop the north of the city is insensitive to the citys concept.
The Chandigarh Administration minced no words in its detailed reply to a public interest litigation while attacking the Punjab government first for allowing and then regularising unauthorised construction in the citys periphery.
The PIL arose out of a suo motu notice taken by the high court on a news item published by Chandigarh Newsline. The news item had highlighted how the proposed project will cause a threat to the citys heritage. A related petition was subsequently filed by advocate Aalok Jagga,through his counsel D S Patwalia challenging the Camelot project.
UT Administrations reply reads: In 1998,the Punjab government regularised all unauthorised construction which had come up in the periphery and was violative of the mandate of the Periphery Control Act. In 2006,Punjab framed its independent policy called the Punjab Periphery Policy,2006 to extensively urbanise the area around Chandigarh. The decision was in contravention to the earlier jointly prepared interstate regional plans and the Chandigarh Urban Complex plan which had focused on dispersing the pressure away from Chandigarh. The policy was framed without consulting the coordination committee and the Chandigarh Administration.
The Administration has slammed Punjab government for not considering Chandigarh while preparing regional plans.
Despite its own decision taken in 2006,the Punjab government has not prepared the comprehensive Periphery Controlled Area Plan. While the state government has prepared the GMADA Regional Plan,2008,it does not include the Nagar Panchayat Nayagaon township and thus cannot be said to be a holistic,comprehensive plan for the entire periphery,the Administration has submitted.
It also added that the development plan for Nayagaon did not consider environmental and ecological ground realities besides important urban design considerations of Chandigarh. UT also voiced its concerns about the development of Nayagaon posing hazards to its environment.
Further,the reply,filed in the High Court today,reads that though there is awareness of the need to preserve planning concepts of Chandigarh to contain growth for maintaining the environment,however on the contrary large scale urbanisation targeted with a population of one lakh by 2021 and with high rise developments have been proposed in the development plan of Nagar Panchayat,Nayagaon which will not only spell disaster for the city of Chandigarh,but will also endanger human life due to the eco fragile nature of the land.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram