Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
In The Art of Choosing,Sheena Iyengar probes how people make their choices,and how too much of it can overwhelm
If you think of it,there is precious little in common between a Sikh wedding in Delhi and a mountaineering expedition in the Peruvian Andes. Yet these are two of the several examples that Sheena Iyengar,professor at the Columbia Business School,uses in her book The Art of Choosing (Hachette India,
Rs 499) to discuss the principles guiding the decisions we make every day.
The Sikh wedding (of Iyengars parents) shows how crucial aspects of a marriagethe choice of whom to marry to what to wear to what to eat can be decided by people other than the bride and the groom. On the other hand,the tale of Joe Simpson,who abseiled over the Andean glacier to safety after his partner Simon Yates had given him up for dead and cut his rope,illustrates how one can choose to survive in the face of unassailable odds.
Iyengars book draws on a lifetime of research,including studies she conducted in college and graduate school,which are used to explain why we choose a particular iPhone or a certain brand of soda or a particular health insurance policy. She was drawn to this particular field of research by an interplay of several factors,among them,being born to Sikh immigrant parents living in North America and more poignantly,the onset of blindness early in life. As part of the immigrant experience,she became a part of two different worlds. These two worlds didnt just comprise two different languages,or two different sets of rules,but offered two entirely different narratives about how to live ones life, she says in email interview.
In fact,the Asian narrative of collectivism,with its emphasis on the we (family,colleagues or village) as contrasted with the American emphasis on individualism explains many of the choices that we make. In an interesting experiment conducted in a San Francisco elementary school that involved choosing and solving anagrams,Iyengar,40,had found that Anglo-American children performed better when allowed to exercise personal choice while Asian American children were motivated when told that their mothers had assigned them a particular task. Iyengar does not privilege either of these choices over the other; collective action,after all,can be as inspiring and purposeful as Gandhis Salt March to Dandi,while tales of inspired individualism abound as well. Both extreme ends of the spectrum are problematic,but different places along the continuum have their own particular benefits, she says.
Blindness was a circumstance that Iyengar had to deal with and which influenced her field of study. Being blind took many options off the table,among them my childhood dream of becoming a pilot. But this bodily condition that I did not choose led me to make the most of what I could choose,reminding me to focus on choices that matter, she says.
Her next project will involve creating a global choice indexfrom consumer products to marriage and religionfor people from 40 countries,including India.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram