Premium
This is an archive article published on June 15, 2016

2008 Malegaon blasts case: Court likely to decide on admissibility of intervention pleas

On Tuesday, the NIA opposed the intervention plea seeking that its chargesheet be discarded claiming that there are no such provision in law to allow the plea.

malegaon blasts, 2008 malegaon blasts, maharashtra ats, Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad, maharashtra ats acquitted accussed, nia, maharashtra news, india news So far, three intervention pleas filed by a victim of the Malegaon blast are being heard by the court.

The special NIA court hearing the Malegaon 2008 blast case is likely to decide on the admissibility of the intervention pleas filed in the case.

So far, three intervention pleas filed by a victim of the Malegaon blast are being heard by the court.

On Tuesday, the NIA opposed the intervention plea seeking that its chargesheet be discarded claiming that there are no such provision in law to allow the plea.

[related-post]

Watch Video: What’s making news

Story continues below this ad

A plea filed by Malegaon resident Nisar Bilal had sought that the court should continue trial on the basis of the chargesheet filed by the Maharashtra ATS. In the second supplementary chargesheet filed by the NIA last month, the agency said there was no evidence against four accused booked by the ATS, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur.

“We opposed the intervention plea and submitted before court that the intervener had not specified how his interest was affected and what was the malice for the prosecution to not place all the facts before the court,” said Special Public Prosecutor Avinash Rasal.

The lawyers of the other accused also opposed the plea. The court is likely to decide on the matter on Wednesday.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement