Premium
This is an archive article published on August 6, 2015

St Stephen’s sexual harassment case: Accused professor refuses to hand over data to student

In his reply, the professor said that Compunds are UGC project property. Now that she is not the student under his supervision and not part of UGC project, thus claim is not justified.

Stephen's harassment case, st stephen's harassment case, stephen's accused professor, stephen's harassment victim's research, UGC project, UGC research, Delhi news, education news, NCR news, India news He also claimed that the research scholar had been working on a UGC project and she had no right to claim ownership of her work, as she had quit voluntarily.

The St Stephen’s College professor accused of sexually harassing a research scholar, on Wednesday refused to give back the woman’s research material, claiming it belonged to the UGC.

The research scholar had sent a caution note to the accused as well as Principal Valson Thampu last week, threatening legal action against them if they did not release her stipend and give her access to the compounds and computational data she had worked on.

In his reply, the professor said, “(Compunds) NY-6, NY-91, NY-92 and 2ny-132 are UGC project property. Now you are not the student under my supervision and not part of UGC project. Your claim is not justified”.

[related-post]

Story continues below this ad

He also claimed that the research scholar had been working on a UGC project and she had no right to claim ownership of her work, as she had quit voluntarily. “It is submitted that you have shifted out of the UGC project yourself, therefore your claims are untenable, unacceptable and unjustified. These false allegations are put for media consumption to intimidate me in accepting your unjustified demands,” he said.

At the end of the note, the accused threatened legal action against the research scholar. “You are requested not to jump into any misadventure and misuse of the process of law as well as withdraw the notice qua me with immediate effect and intimate the same within seven days from the date of receipt of this reply, failing which I shall be constrained to defend my right and take legal action against you including defamation under Indian Penal Code…” he said.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement