Premium
This is an archive article published on August 8, 2024

Minnesota court upholds Walz-backed law restoring felons’ right to vote

The court's unanimous ruling did not address the merits of the law, instead finding that the conservative group that had challenged the law, the Minnesota Voters Alliance, did not have the legal standing to do so.

Tim Walz kamala harrisMinnesota Gov. Tim Walz listens after meeting with President Joe Biden, July 3, 2024, at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo)

The Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a law signed last year by Governor Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential candidate, that restores the right to vote for felons who have completed their prison terms.

The court’s unanimous ruling did not address the merits of the law, instead finding that the conservative group that had challenged the law, the Minnesota Voters Alliance, did not have the legal standing to do so.

In a statement, the alliance’s founder, Doug Seaton, said the decision “sidesteps the necessary constitutional scrutiny” of the law.

Story continues below this ad

Walz, a two-term governor, was named the running mate for Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris on Tuesday. The two were traveling to Wisconsin and Michigan on Wednesday during their first campaign swing as a White House ticket.

The law in question allows felons to vote after they have been released from prison, even if they remain on parole or probation. Incarcerated felons are not permitted to cast ballots in Minnesota.

The campaign of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump criticized Walz on Tuesday for supporting the law, even though Trump himself was convicted of 34 felonies in New York this year for falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to a porn star.

Trump lives and votes in Florida, which defers to the jurisdiction where a conviction occurred when determining whether a felon can vote. Under New York law, similar to Minnesota, convicted felons such as Trump are permitted to vote unless they are incarcerated at the time of the election.

Story continues below this ad

Trump has maintained his innocence and claimed without evidence that the New York case is part of a Democratic conspiracy against him.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement