Premium
This is an archive article published on August 27, 2002

‘You can’t be a good neighbour with tolerance alone’

Diana Eck grew up in the tiny American Montana town of Bozeman in a Swedish Methodist Christian community. The first city she ever lived in ...

.

Diana Eck grew up in the tiny American Montana town of Bozeman in a Swedish Methodist Christian community. The first city she ever lived in was also the world’s most ancient: Benares, where she came as a student-researcher in 1965. Today, Eck is Professor of Comparative Religion and Indian Studies at Harvard University. She’s also Director of its Pluralism Project on religious diversity since 1991 and a member, since 1996, of the advisory committee to the US Secretary of State on Religious Freedom Abroad. To Indians, however, Eck is the author of important books on living faith like Benares, City of Light and Encountering God: A Spiritual Journey from Bozeman to Benares. In New Delhi for a few days, she spoke to Renuka Narayanan.

What are you here for, this time?
This is a very short visit, barely a week, because I have to get back to teach! I have to deliver three talks on Religious Pluralism, at the Indian Council of Historical Research, the Centre for Historical Studies, JNU, and Teen Murti House. After that, I hope I can run down to Vrindavan for Janmashtami. My friends there are Purushottam Maharaj, mahant of the Radharaman Temple and his son, Srivats Goswami who was with me in Harvard—he’s big on interfaith dialogue too!

What’s special about Janmashtami there?
(Laughs) Krishna! Vrindavan. The intimate atmosphere of worship, typical of north India. Even at Kashi Vishwanath, you can go right in, touch everything. It’s different in south India—a sense of more restricted access to the deity. In Kedarnath, they have both: in the elaborate evening arati, you have to go through the priest. But in the morning, you can go right in. It’s as though nirgun (the universal) and sagun (the particular) are both given time.

Story continues below this ad

Your mantras are words like ‘‘inclusivism’’ and ‘‘pluralism’’. Please explain them.
Inclusivism is benign to other faiths but it basically believes that its own point of view is best. The unsettling element here is that it dodges the question of real difference by finally reducing everything to the religious language of one tradition. Pluralism is an interpretation of plurality, of religious and cultural diversity. Plurality is the diversity, active participation in this diversity, not just standing and watching. It’s not simply tolerance but the seeking of understanding. You can’t be a good neighbour with tolerance alone, it does not remove our ignorance of one another.

How does your Pluralism Project help in this delicate business?
We document everything that happens and see the patterns. Pluralistic dialogue can happen intra-religiously, too. In Nashville, which is the heart of American country and blue grass music, when the Hindu community got large enough, they came together to build a temple. Gujaratis, Tamils, UP-walas and Bengalis encountered their own diversity. They had to satisfy themselves as Hindus and also satisfy the American civic system. They had to elect a board, with a chairman and a committee. And they sent out a ballot on which deity should occupy the sannidhi (main shrine). Everyone voted for Ganesha and so it’s called the SriGanesha Temple, Nashville. When Fairfax County Hindus put up a Durga temple, the County Commissioners declared a Durga Temple Appreciation Week. The Mayor read out a declaration on the contribution of Hindus to Fairfax County. This is symbolic recognition that ‘‘We, the people’’ of America are not monolithic, that we welcome diversity, ever since the landmark change in immigration law in 1965, which altered our religious landscape dramatically.

Are you up-to-date with Hindutva vis-a-vis Hinduism?
In my upcoming book, I go a lot into Hindu sacred geography, into the pilgrim circuits. The interesting thing is, no place stands alone! Each one is linked to so many others in a vast network, through series that accommodate other series. So you have 12 Jyotirlingas, 108 Shaktipeeths, many Kashis and Gangas, the six temples of Murugan, the Vaishnava circuit, the Braj Mandal. All of them represent each other.

This is central to Hinduism: the One in the Many, which is also the US national motto—E Pluribus Unum. In Hinduism, it’s summed up in the saying Kashi ke kankar Shankar samaan. ‘‘Each pebble in Kashi represents Shiva’’ and that’s why pilgrims take them away and recreate their own Kashis. Which is why I’m most distressed that Ayodhya, which exists everywhere in multiple forms, is being reduced to the singular. In any case, the main attention in Ayodhya was always for the Panchkroshi circuit around the city and the Hanuman garhi, while several sites in Ayodhya itself claim to be the Janmabhoomi.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement