Premium
This is an archive article published on January 18, 2004

Whose Present is this Anyway?

The space that separates a turbulent past and an uncertain future is filled with inertia and numbness. At least that is how the white and bl...

.

The space that separates a turbulent past and an uncertain future is filled with inertia and numbness. At least that is how the white and black denizens of a former homeland in South Africa find themselves once the local dictator of the homeland had been thrown out, and the era of apartheid was gone, in South African novelist Damon Galgut’s book The Good Doctor.

Galgut, who was among the nominees for the Booker Prize in 2003, puts post-apartheid South Africa on the operation table, as it were, as he tells the story of a deserted yet still ‘‘functioning’’ hospital in a former capital town of a former homeland, once symbols of racial segregation. The hospital and the town are deserted because they continue to be symbols of racism and though history books have flipped those pages, the natives who had been once dumped into these artificial townships by their former white regime do not want to forget the past and come back and live under the rubble of their past.

Frank Eloff, a white doctor at the hospital, is resigned to the fact that the hospital will never actually have patients. So are the head of the hospital and two other doctors. All of them are resigned and almost happy in this inertia. Until the ‘‘good’’ doctor arrives.

Story continues below this ad

An intern, Lawrence Waters chooses the hospital for his compulsory rural posting — and, in his feverish idealism, is bent upon changing things there.

Since the patients won’t come there, he decides to take the hospital to the people in a sort of mobile clinic approach, which is at first resented and then accepted by the other doctors. Frank continues to be skeptical and feels that a clinic here or there with no medicines and mere words can mean nothing.

This despondent situation is reflected in the dishevelled personal lives of the two protagonists Frank and Lawrence. Frank’s brutal realism and cynicism are shaped by a broken marriage, of a friend who ran off with his wife, and of guilt at having spent a brief spell with the army and having been part of the racist regime. He is torn within and he seeks no escape from the glare of his truth. Even idealism for him is false.

‘‘Mike had been my friend until he ran off with my wife. Since then I hadn’t made any friends. I didn’t want anyone getting too close to me,’’ he says at one point, annoyed by the fact that Lawrence referred to him as a friend.

Story continues below this ad

Lawrence, on the other hand, walks along blindfolded with a band of idealism which conceals his arrogance as well as a certain dishonesty in accepting reality as it is.

However, his enthusiasm is infectious and it does stir up the drowsy hospital into a vague desire to do something.

The tension between the unrealistic goals of an idealist and the despondency of Frank who is grappling with the redundancy of all action, alongwith mesmerising prose, give the plot momentum.

The past returns now and then, once in a brief encounter between Frank and the former dictator of the homeland who has been assumed dead. But it is the timeless despair of being caught between the past and present that pervades the book.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement