Tags:
Journalism of Courage
Union HRD Minister Kapil Sibals proposals have begun a debate and there is a looming conflict between grand conceptions and frustrating details. Especially,the proposal for a single national board at the Class 12 level is very likely to run into rough weather. It needs the tightrope walk of discussion and coordination between the Centre and the states. While states like Maharashtra and Gujarat have welcomed it,voices of protest have already emerged from Left-ruled West Bengal and Kerala that smell a conspiracy to over-centralise and privatise education,and to upset the federal structure.
Whether or not we are about to witness a fresh Unitary vs Federalist line-up,it must be admitted that a single national board,with a uniform system of evaluation,would conveniently ease the national mobility of students currently under state boards and end the annual fiasco over admissions and the relative assessment of scores under various boards,with varied marking practices. It would,by extension,make national talent assessment easier and more accurate. On the other hand,Sibals ministry would have to be careful about the issue of diversity a single national board cannot afford to be seen as trampling on regional culture and history through uniform and centrally-determined syllabi. To circumvent this problem,the proposed board could offer states latitude over humanities and liberal arts syllabi,whereby regional literature and history can be adequately accommodated. Mathematics and the other sciences can be assumed to be more or less universal,and therefore not standing in the way of homogeneity.
