Cosmetics and drugs cannot be treated at par with food articles when it comes to labelling them with a red or a green mark to distinguish on the basis of vegetarian and non-vegetarian ingredients.
Also,since the food habits in India vary from person to person and from place to place,the Supreme Court has ruled,it is not practicable and desirable to display identifications about the origin of the non-vegetarian ingredients in the packages of drugs and cosmetics.
The Drugs and Cosmetics Act,1940 or the rules framed thereunder do not mandate mentioning or displaying symbol of ingredients of non-vegetarian or vegetarian origin. The manufacturer or others are not required to mention vegetarian or non-vegetarian on the label of drugs or cosmetics, held a Bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya.
Illustrating a range of differences in food habits among the vegetarian and non-vegetarians,it said: In individual case,the central government may feel difficulty in specifying the origin of a vegetarian or non-vegetarian ingredient,if a person wants to know the definite origin of such vegetarian or non-vegetarian ingredient on the basis of his food habit. It also said the plea was not maintainable before the High Court.
The court noted that a consumer could not seek information about the origin of ingredients as a matter of right since the disclosure was subjected to reasonable restriction and larger public interest.
It set aside a 2002-Delhi HC order that had held that consumer has the fundamental right to know whether the food products,cosmetics and drugs available are of non-vegetarian or vegetarian origin. Pending an amendment in the Act,the HC ordered for red or green labels on the packages.
However,the Centre and the Indian Soaps & Toiletries Makers Association challenged it. The Centre said it was not possible to demarcate drugs as life saving or otherwise since under the condition of patient,a drug,which ordinarily may not be treated,so can be used as a life saving drug.