Premium
This is an archive article published on March 23, 2000

Triumph of democracy

China has its leaders' aggressive noises to thank for making the outcome of the presidential elections in Taiwan look like a vote for inde...

.

China has its leaders’ aggressive noises to thank for making the outcome of the presidential elections in Taiwan look like a vote for independence whereas that has not been the factor uppermost in the minds of voters. What it looks like is a vote for change within the island. After 50 years of rule by the Nationalist Party which under President Lee Teng-hui was willing to adopt some democratic practices in order to prolong its hold on power, the people of Taiwan have said enough is enough.

It is time to retire the party of “mainlanders” who fled to Taiwan after the communist takeover in China and give a party of native Taiwanese a chance. Certainly the candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party, Chen Shui-bian, who won the poll, said during the campaign that he was pro-independence. But he got only 39 per cent of the vote in a triangular contest in which the other candidates, Nationalist Party leader Lien Chan and a breakaway Nationalist leader standing as an independent, James Soong, were both fairly clearly in favour of Beijing’s one-China policy.

There is good reason to believe that the outcome owes a great deal to factors such as the people’s anger with the corruption of the Nationalist Party and the increasingly dictatorial behaviour of President Lee Teng-hui. The split in Nationalist ranks after Soong quit also played a part in Chen’s victory. Beijing’s unfamiliarity with democratic elections would account for it overlooking the full complexity behind voter choices. But the predominant reason for misjudging the situation was evidently Beijing’s hyper-sensitivity on the issue of Taiwanese independence. It is strange how Beijing convinced itself that its one-China policy would only be safe in the hands of the Nationalist Party which has grown into a $7 billion business empire and is known to have extensive links with organised crime.

Story continues below this ad

Short of firing missiles over the Taiwan straits as it did during the island’s first-ever presidential elections a few years ago, Chinese leaders did everything they could to intimidate voters and deter them from backing Chen.

In the event, Beijing has ended up with egg on its face. It is probable some people were afraid to jeopardise their jobs and security and voted for the status quo. But a great number have learned not to let big brother next door meddle in their business. The achievement of Taiwanese democracy is that it has made people more confident. They will remain pragmatic and keep a wary eye on the mainland but they are not going to let Beijing dictate.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement