EVER heard the term ‘‘treatment-naive’’? It’s a phrase that will become more and more common as India wrestles with the ethically sensitive issue of permitting new foreign drugs to be tested in the country concurrently with Phase I trials abroad. For the moment, lend an ear to Sadruddin Hirani, an employee in the wholesale shoe business, rather awed by regular visits to a posh South Mumbai clinic, the Chowpatty Medical Centre. Some 1,200 patients have undergone quiet trials here for global drug majors, including Eli Lilly and Pfizer, for more than 10 years. Hirani fits the description to the T. Last year, he signed an Informed Consent Document to ease a costly battle with Type II Diabetes for two global glucose monitoring trials. He doesn’t know the sponsor names and is quite indifferent to the fact. ‘‘Look, I didn’t have a stable job, insulin costs Rs 1,700 a month,’’ the 43-year-old says. ‘‘I have two daughters. And I weighed 49 kgs.’’ Impressed with four cellphone numbers of doctors he can dial anytime to report adverse reactions, the frail man allowed two sensors to be implanted in his abdomen. In return, he adds triumphantly, ‘‘I got free insulin, tablets, and Rs 4,000 in monthly compensation.’’ In dingy civil hospitals and upscale private clinics alike, visits to the doctor are rapidly becoming akin to state secrets. The stakes are higher than patient privacy, the risks greater than life and death. The happy hunting ground for the drug developers are the hospital OPDs, where millions throng every day. At least some are happy to swallow free medicine, ideal candidates for swift, low-cost clinical trials. A far cry from Europe and the US (see graphics). HOW to prevent mystery deaths and adverse reactions suffered by patients is still a fuzzy area. ‘‘Due to lack of drug penetration, India has a huge patient population that’s never been subjected to any drug,’’ says a Rabo India 2003 study. ‘‘This gives a critical pool of naive or uncontaminated patients important in conducting clinical trials’’. ‘‘India has a huge, treatment-naive population of heterogenous Caucasians with diseases of both the industrialised and third world. Large, extended families still live in proximity, making them attractive recruits for genetic linkage studies.’’ — Centrewatch, international clinical trials listing service, in an August 2003 report Some time ago, Dharmesh Vasava, a 22-year-old volunteer from Bharuch in Gujarat died, reportedly during tests for citalopram, an anti-psychotic drug sponsored by Mumbai-based Sun Pharmaceuticals. More recently, some 400 unsuspecting young women in small towns across the country were reportedly illegally used as guinea pigs by self-styled researchers at private clinics to test if anti-cancer drug Letrozole — again, a Sun Pharma product — can aid ovulation. The drug is considered toxic for the foetus or embryo. When contacted, Sun Pharma spokesperson Mira Desai would only say: ‘‘The company cannot speak on the issue’’. ‘‘Even animals subjected to experiments in USA enjoy more protection than humans in India,’’ says former WHO drug expert Dr C M Gulhati, editor of Monthly Index of Medical Specialities. ‘‘Unethical and illegal trials are conducted with impunity because the regulatory authorities, either by default or design, fail to take action.’’ Legally, all clinical trials require clearance from the Drugs Controller-General, India, and the approval of the ethics committee of the hospital concerned. Research is supposed to be conducted only at recognised centres by duly qualified and experienced investigators (see box overleaf). But the lapses, and their number, are alarming.