Premium
This is an archive article published on August 4, 2002

Strangers in their Own Home

THE tears of the kin of the six youths who died in police firing and group clashes during the July 24 Ranchi bandh in protest against Jharkh...

.

THE tears of the kin of the six youths who died in police firing and group clashes during the July 24 Ranchi bandh in protest against Jharkhand CM Babulal Marandi’s domicile policy are history.

The truth today is that Marandi continues to remain firmly in the CM’s chair; he has expertly played the domicile card to gain electoral mileage for the BJP, and even secured his own future despite the party’s loss in the Dumka by-election. So far only four of the 44-member treasury bench in the 82-member Assembly have opposed the domicile policy. The four are Samata Party MLAs and ministers Ramchandra Kesri and Bachcha Singh and two BJP MLAs, state industry minister P N Singh and C P Singh.

But Marandi is only too aware of the fact that none of his critics have quit — or even threatened to quit — his government. ‘‘These people should forget their own vested interests. In the interest of the millions of poor people who live in the districts and villages, they should be judicious. If they are not given preference in appointment to Class III and Class IV jobs, it would be against the principle of social justice,’’ says Marandi.

Story continues below this ad

The domicile issue was born almost simultaneously with the state. Minutes after Marandi took office, hundreds of supporters of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha chief Shibu Soren began demanding that Soren — leader of just 12 MLAs — be appointed the CM instead. Marandi responded by encouraging the establishment of the Jharkhand Janadhikar Manch (JJM) and the Adivasi Chhatra Sangh (ACS), who hit the roads demanding 60 per cent reservation for tribals, though they comprise just 27.78 per cent of the state’s population. Soon afterwards, the Jharkhand Vikas Party, led by Ramdayal Munda, came up with the demand for jobs and contracts to people whose ancestors figured in the 1932 records.

Soren supported Munda’s demand on July 26, 2001. Soon afterwards, the state cabinet took two controversial decisions, providing 73 per cent reservation and adopting a domicile-preference policy based on the 1932 land records. It was a master-stroke for Marandi; the BJP base, so far, had been largely confined to non-tribals. All Jharkhandis welcomed the move, even as two residents filed PILs, describing the decisions as ‘‘unconstitutional’’.

Before the court could respond, the state police issued advertisements on July 3 this year, inviting applications for posts of constables. All applicants had to attach domicile certificates. In the meantime, though, no effort was made to check whether the records were intact, or whether the certificates could be issued.

The fallout was perhaps inevitable. Scores of people who failed to get the certificates ransacked the offices of the COs in Bokaro and Dhanbad on July 7. Bachcha Singh, brother of ex-coal mafialord Surya Deo Singh, backed them, but just hours later, ACS supporters stoned his official residence.

Story continues below this ad

Two bodies — the Jharkhand Yuva Sangharsh Samiti and the Upekshit Manch — allegedly financed by Bachcha Singh came up to demand withdrawal of the policy and call a bandh on July 18.

Even as the BJP and the Congress were handling a divide in their ranks, 58 organisations called Jharkhand bandhs on July 20 and 24, when largescale violence claimed six lives. On these crucial days, Chief Secretary V S Dubey was on leave, while Marandi was in Delhi; he returned only after the death of six youths.

As each incident of violence convulsed the state — and telegraphed to the Jharkhandis that Marandi was with them — the CM became more entrenched in power. No matter the umpteen unfulfilled promises, he is the best bet for the BJP right now.

The Hearth of the Matter

Interviews with JMM president Shibu Soren and former Ranchi University V-C and Jharkhand Vikas Party chief Ramdayal Munda

What’s your stand on the domicile policy?
Soren: I neither support nor oppose it. I have just taken it as poison administered to the people by h**** Marandi to gain electoral mileage. It’s nothing different from what Modi did in Gujarat post-Godhra.
Munda: The policy is pro-people.

Story continues below this ad

But the anti-domicile outfits are also backed by the people?
Soren:They are the ones who have looted and plundered Jharkhand systematically for years. Jaisa karm karoge waisa fal dega insan, yeh hai Geeta ka gyan.
Munda: They represent a tiny group.

How?
Soren: Don’t you know the history of crime in Dhanbad, Bokaro, Ranchi, Jamshedpur? They were responsible for scams, murders, rapes and now they seek equality of opportunity in government jobs. They should have a heart.
Munda: There were four basic issues behind the Jharkhand movement: land and forest alienation, training and job deprivation because of outsiders, cultural submergence and unbalanced development. Unless these issues are addressed by the government, there can’t be any development.

The pro-domicile outfits were responsible for largescale violence, which led to the death of six people. Even now, night curfew is on in two police station areas. Do you approve of this?
Soren: Never. One historical wrong can’t be set right by another. Everybody, whether they support the issue or not, should sit together and amicably resolve the dispute. I want peace, without which there will be no development, no jobs.
Munda: Nobody can approve of it, but violence can’t be ruled out in a situation in which a small group of influential people openly challenges the majority. The anti-policy outfits need to accept the government decision.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement