Speaking truth to terror

In Zurich last week, on my way to Davos, I read an interview with Milton Friedman in the Wall Street Journal.

In Zurich last week, on my way to Davos, I read an interview with Milton Friedman in the Wall Street Journal. It was one of the last interviews the Nobel prize-winning economist gave before his death last November. One of the questions he was asked was 8212; what did he consider to be the biggest threat to the world economy.

His answer: 8220;Islamofascism, with terrorism as its weapon.8221;

This answer made an impression on me because it was devoid of the politically correct pussyfooting that is usually the essence of any comment on terrorism these days.

Sadly, of the discussions on terrorism and Islam in snowy Davos the opposite is true. One of the first sessions I attended at this year8217;s annual meeting of the World Economic Forum was called 8220;The Comprehensive Response to Terrorism8221;, and there could not be a better panel to discuss the subject.

There was Pakistan Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz, Britain8217;s Leader of Opposition David Cameron, US Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, European Union Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, Gijs M. deVries. A dream panel, you would say. Yet, what a disappointment it turned out to be.

Pakistan has been in recent years the country most associated with the promotion of terrorism as a tool of foreign policy. It is the country of Abdul Qadeer Khan, who ran a vast black market in nuclear weapons technology and who cannot be punished because he remains a national hero. It is the country that we associate with the sponsorship of terrorist groups in Kashmir, and Afghanistan charges with reinventing the Taliban.

And yet, Shaukat Aziz got away with talking about the need to understand the 8220;root causes8221; and even with saying that poverty and deprivation were why it was so easy to recruit suicide bombers in the Islamic world.

Poverty and deprivation? Were the 9/11 hijackers poor or deprived? No. They were, as Shaukat Aziz must know, engineers and architects and students who had benefited from studying in western universities.

Story continues below this ad

And, in our own country, is it not educated, middle-class Muslims who join terrorist groups like SIMI? Do Hezbollah fanatics who are trying to hijack Lebanon look poor and deprived?

David Cameron tried pointing out that the terrorist threat we face today is different from any other because young Muslims are being radicalised by 8220;false prophets8221; and we need to acknowledge this. But his was a small voice compared to those who wanted 8220;root causes8221; understood.

In a session on making the 8220;Rules for a Global Neighbourhood in a Multicultural World8221;, Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and a Saudi princess carried on the theme of understanding root causes and it was only some direct talk from an Israeli rabbi, David Rosen, that brought a measure of balance.

Rosen said that everything was blamed on Israel8217;s dispute with Palestine, but this had gone on too far. What did this dispute have to do with Darfur, or what is happening in Somalia?

Story continues below this ad

What does it have to do with killing 200 commuters on Mumbai8217;s trains or blowing up Hindu temples? Besides, Israel8217;s dispute with Palestine has been around a long, long time and it is only now that you see 8216;Islamofascism8217; spreading its cult of murder and death across the world.

What has happened to make peaceful Muslim communities in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and in our own country suddenly become defensive about 8220;root causes8221; and Islam?

American foreign policy since 9/11 has done much to make things worse. The war on Iraq was a stupid mistake from the start. The world would have been a very different place today if Afghanistan had been chosen instead for the imposition of American style democracy.

But nothing justifies terrorism, and if we are too politically correct to state this clearly, we are doomed to be destroyed by 8216;Islamofascism8217;. When we are looking for root causes we need to remember that Osama bin Laden8217;s stated goal is to destroy western civilisation. Is this a demand that can be discussed over a negotiating table?

Story continues below this ad

The 8216;Islamofascists8217; who operate in our country make it clear with every one of their evil deeds that their aim is to destroy India8217;s economy and its secular democracy. Is this something that we can discuss over a negotiating table? If we want to win the global war on terrorism we have to begin by acknowledging that 8216;Islamofascism8217; is as evil an ideology as Nazism once was and those of us who are its victims must fight back with everything we have.

What is worrying is that instead of doing this our political leaders seem more concerned about heightening the Muslim sense of grievance by giving us nonsense like the Sachar Committee report. Can we at least hope for a report on 8216;Islamofascism8217; as well?