Premium
This is an archive article published on July 18, 2004

Short-cut is one way ahead

In this new century, administrators and players are challenged to keep the game moving forward as well as develop ideas to attract new adher...

.

In this new century, administrators and players are challenged to keep the game moving forward as well as develop ideas to attract new adherents. One solution is shortening the game even further to attract the crowds.

England, South Africa and Sri Lanka have introduced the Twenty/20 game; even in the US, after a century of neglect, administrators are attempting something similar. In the last case, the admin guys have caught on to a format that might attract even locals. After all, which American would understand the intricacies of ball placement by those such as Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid or Virender Sehwag; or even the swing and seam of Shaun Pollock, Glenn McGrath or Irfan Pathan?

And Twenty20, whatever its drawbacks and imperfections in terms of technique and skills, does impress upon the bowler the need for discipline. So far India, Pakistan and Australia have shunned introducing the format into domestic competitions and it is easy to understand why. Does the game need such gimmicks, and can countries such as South Africa and Sri Lanka support three forms of domestic competition? They’ve tried other means. In South Africa, the UCB has embarked on a system involving six franchise teams — and, to introduce this system last April, staged the high successful Pro20 competition which in some cases drew as many spectators as ODIs.

LONG ROOM, SHORT STUFF

There is a lot of ignorance about the franchise format that is designed to improve the standard levels with strength versus strength teams in first-class and limited overs domestic competitions. It is felt that if South Africa are to compete with Australia, the playing fields need to be levelled fora stronger national side. In October, Sri Lanka introduce their Twenty/20 programme but the domestic system, partly overhauled last season, is still in serious need of revision. The club system has been allowed to dominate for too long and has become seriously diluted as inferior players are filtered into an over-burdened first-class structure where selectors and coaches are tainted by administrative and school system politics.

Winning the World Cup eight years ago has become an albatross, for the sport attracted a maverick element as well as people who know little about the game. Trying to develop a winning culture out of this morass takes a lot of hard work as important issues such as creating the correct player environment is swamped by board politics.

Recent selections also suggest that the national panel, of which there are seven, don’t have a clue about playing strength. The country’s fifth top wicketkeeper, Rashan Peiris, was overlooked when selection was made for a composite Sri Lanka A XI to play Hong Kong in an Asia Cup practice match. National convener Asantha de Mel was alarmed to find all-rounder Jeewan Mendis keeping wicket an on enquiry discovered that one of the Ministry nominees admitted he had no idea that Peiris was a wicketkeeper.

Amid this chaos, Sri Lanka Cricket’s vice president Aravinda de Silva is trying to pull together a system that he hopes will revive the island nation’s image and find ‘new age’ players to carry the game forward. Like South Africa and Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka are still looking for a magic formula to produce winning teams.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement