Premium
This is an archive article published on October 18, 2002

Resetting the thermostat

The Indian decision to relocate forces with the idea of reducing military deployment at the international border south of J&K, would by all ...

.

The Indian decision to relocate forces with the idea of reducing military deployment at the international border south of J&K, would by all accounts be executed in a way that does not ‘impair’ its ability to respond to a possible emergency.

In other words, any withdrawal would be without prejudice to the right or ability to use military force. In simple terms, this means that some forces would remain in position and the armoured strike formations would be gradually withdrawn from their forward locations. Some of the forces are already involved in peacetime training since the exercise season is about to begin. The elaborate manner in which the decision was made public was obviously designed to strengthen its political significance.

This significance could be soon lost if it is not buttressed by political and diplomatic measures.

Story continues below this ad

The prompt Pakistani response announcing the withdrawal of its military forces back to peacetime locations is to be welcomed. General Pervez Musharraf has been repeatedly asking for de-escalation, and the current developments should open up opportunities for reducing tensions in the overall relationship.

Militarily, the withdrawal of Pakistani strike formations back to their peacetime locations was critical if the existing confrontation was to be rolled back. Pakistan army’s strike formations staying on in operational locations on the border after the Indian forces have withdrawn would have led to a highly unstable and potentially dangerous situation.

As it is, the Pakistani armoured forces are located much closer to the international border during peacetime than the Indian army’s strike formations. Any delay by Islamabad in announcing appropriate reciprocal measures would have only fuelled avoidable suspicions. It should now be possible for regular communications and dialogue between the two military headquarters to avoid any potential misunderstandings.

Meanwhile, New Delhi would do well to ponder over the political and diplomatic steps to be taken, especially its stated position of not holding talks with Pakistan. It is true that the level of terrorism has not come down in any meaningful way. It is also true that very little may be achieved by such a dialogue since the respective positions have extremely limited flexibility available.

Story continues below this ad

At the same time, unless the intention is to cut off normal relations with Pakistan for all time to come, dialogue and efforts to nudge it towards a normal relationship would remain an important concern. The central point, therefore, should not be whether dialogue with Pakistan is to be held or not, but rather the goals and levels of such dialogue. Political summitry would be a faraway goal.

But if Pakistan is agreeable, then military-to-military dialogue could commence to handle the practical aspects of de-escalation. This could be followed by official level talks to re-open communications and normal diplomatic activities.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement