Iraqis involved in the effort to write a new constitution said on Monday that completing the document in six months, the goal set by Secretary of State Colin L. Powell last week, will be impossible to meet because of differences over how to select the drafters and more profound disagreements over the role of Islamic law and the basic contours of a new political system.
A committee of lawyers, scholars and religious figures that was supposed to propose a way to select delegates to a constitutional convention has not been able to agree on a preferred method, according to members of the country’s Governing Council. By shifting the decision to the 24-member Governing Council, which could choose to debate the issue or kick it back to the committee, the members said the selection process has effectively been delayed for months.
UN leaves skeletal foreign employees
|
UNITED NATIONS: The UN cut its foreign staff in Iraq over the weekend to less than 50 people, down from 86 last week and over 600 before the August 19 bombing of its Baghdad offices. UN spokesman Fred Eckhard gave the new numbers, without disclosing an exact figure for security reasons. (Reuters) |
Powell said last week that six months was ‘‘a good timeline’’ for the creation of the constitution. ‘‘It’s impossible to do it in six months as Powell wants,’’ said council member Dara Noureddine, the council’s liaison with the committee.
Noureddine said in an interview Monday that Iraqis first need to decide how to select the drafters. Then those people will have to be chosen. Once they finally gather to begin drafting the document, they will have to sort through a raft of contentious issues, including whether to adopt a presidential or parliamentary system, and whether Islam is recognised as the sole basis for laws.
Resolving those matters almost certainly will involve lengthy debates among not just the delegates but politicians, religious figures and other prominent members of Iraqi society.
Samir Shakir, another council member, said there is a general consensus on the council that the constitution should be written as quickly as possible. Noureddine and other council members said a longer timetable to write the constitution should not result in a longer occupation. They rejected the US view that a constitution and elections must precede a transfer of sovereignty. The US contends that if they transfer sovereignty before a constitution is drafted and a democratically elected government is seated, the interim political authority could prolong the process. (LAT-WP)