Premium
This is an archive article published on June 1, 2004

‘Pak got it wrong on Simla Pact, Jan 6’

The Centre today accused Pakistan of ‘‘deliberately ignoring’’ remarks by External Affairs Minister K. Natwar Singh and ...

.

The Centre today accused Pakistan of ‘‘deliberately ignoring’’ remarks by External Affairs Minister K. Natwar Singh and taking them out of context, even as Pakistan Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri proposed a ‘‘rhetoric restraint regime’’ on the part of both the governments.

‘‘This has worked well in the recent past and should work after the transition of the Government of India,’’ said Kasuri said.

Meanwhile, in the wake of accusations by Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesman Masood Khan — that New Delhi’s emphasis on the Simla agreement had ‘‘logical fallacies’’ — Foreign Secretary Shashank today in turn accused Islamabad of ‘‘erroneous’’ interpretations.

Story continues below this ad

He insisted that Simla was the ‘‘bedrock’’ of bilateral ties, but New Delhi would abide by all ‘‘subsequent agreements and declarations and the January 6 press statement’’ between former PM Vajpayee and President Musharraf.

 
Gen calls on Vajpayee
   

New Delhi believes that the strong reaction from Pakistan is the brainchild of the country’s foreign secretary Riaz Khokhar.

The Foreign Secretary, said ‘‘suggestions or inferences that there are differences in intent’’ between Simla and the January 6 statement are ‘‘obviously erroneous’’.

Reacting to the Pakistan spokesman’s statement that New Delhi had still not offered new dates for talks on nuclear confidence-building measures or a Foreign Secretary dialogue, officials here said the talks on both counts would be held in June.

Story continues below this ad

‘‘We have laid out a framework for the composite dialogue in the coming months. That process would provide us the opportunity to dicuss all these issues and any apprehensions in detail,’’ said Shashank.

Meanwhile, Kasuri has said if the ‘‘Simla agreement is invoked to find solutions, then we do not have any problem. However if it’s being suggested for the purpose of freezing the Kashmir issue, it will not work or lead to durable peace in South Asia…Our object is to transcend the past by resolving the issue’’.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement