Premium
This is an archive article published on February 4, 2004

‘Out of order’ Oppn holds up budget by an hour

The presentation of the general interim budget was held up for over an hour today in the Lok Sabha following objections from the Opposition....

.

The presentation of the general interim budget was held up for over an hour today in the Lok Sabha following objections from the Opposition.

Former PM Chandrashekhar, Congress deputy leader Shivraj Patil, party chief whip Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi, CPI(M) leader Somnath Chatterjee and RJD leader Raghuvansh Prasad Singh objected to the budget, challenging the session’s legality as it did not begin with the President’s address to a joint session of Parliament. Dasmunsi also objected to the use of expression interim budget, arguing that the Constitution and the rules did not provide for it.

Speaker Manohar Joshi rejected Opposition points of order and ruled that they were ‘‘out of order’’. He said: ‘‘It is not treated as a fresh session. This session can be treated as the second part of the Winter Session.’’

Story continues below this ad

Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee, Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani and Leader of the Opposition Sonia Gandhi were present. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Law Minister Arun Jaitley contested the Opposition’s stand, while HRD Minister Murli Manohar Joshi, target of Chatterjee’s swipes, tried to combat him in between the speeches.

Swaraj reminded Dasmunsi that the expression interim budget was also used by in 1996-97 by then Finance Minister Manmohan Singh. Since the House had not been prorogued, the Winter Session was continuing. Quoting from a book by Kaul and Shakdhar, she said if the House, after being adjourned sine die, is reconvened, it is called the second part of the last session. ‘‘This is the second part of the session,’’ she said, maintaining that ‘‘it is an open-and-shut-case’’.

Earlier, Chatterjee said the first session in a year had to commence with an address by the President. ‘‘It is a new session and the first session,’’ he maintained. Citing a Calcutta High Court judgment, he said House proceedings, if not conducted in accordance with the Constitution and rules, can be held illegal. ‘‘It is an unconstitutional sitting,’’ he claimed. Patil said the Government must state whether or not ‘‘this is the first session of the year’’.

Chandrashekhar said there was no doubt that this was the year’s first session. Challenging the Government stand, he said: ‘‘Democracy cannot be run through falsehood.’’

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement