
The VHP protests notwithstanding, the BJP is hopeful of a solution to the Ayodhya issue emerging from the July 6 meeting of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, convened to discuss the formula floated by Kanchi Kamakotti Shankaracharya Jayendra Saraswati.
However, because of the VHP din over a perceived Ayodhya-for-Kashi-and-Mathura formula mooted by the Shankaracharya, the party is shying away from taking a categorical stand on the two shrines. It apparently plans positioning itself on the sensitive issue only after it knows of the AIMPLB’s response to the formula.
|
Seer’s proposal: AIMPLB |
|
|
LUCKNOW: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) was ‘‘unanimous’’ in its decision to consider with an ‘‘open mind’’ Kanchi seer Jayendra Saraswati’s proposals to resolve the Ayodhya tangle. ‘‘There is no difference of opinion among the members of the board with regard to considering the Kanchi Seer’s proposals,’’ AIMPLB spokesman Maulana Sajjad Nomani said here on Tuesday. Expressing confidence that criticism would die down once the proposals are tabled for consideration at the AIMPLB’s working committee meeting slated for July 6 here, Nomani said the proposals had been kept in the safe custody of the AIMPLB chairman Maulana Rabe Hasan Nadvi. —PTI |
Party sources said today, ‘‘We are hopeful of a positive outcome from the Shankaracharya’s parleys with Muslims.’’ As for Kashi and Mathura, they said: ‘‘We don’t want to say anything. We may, perhaps, say something only after the July 6 meeting of the AIMPLB.’’
The Ayodhya issue, according to them, can be resolved by adopting any of the three courses — mutual negotiations, court adjudication and a legislation. The third course is ruled out because the BJP does not have the requisite strength in Parliament.
The litigation being a long-drawn process, the party feels the negotiations initiated by the Shankaracharya with the AIMPLB can bring in positive results within a short span of time.
Keen on retaining the party’s appeal among Hindus, BJP president M. Venkaiah Naidu utilised a meeting of convenors of state cultural cells at the party headquarters to underline that ‘‘we are not ashamed of our Hindutva ideology, nor are we apologetic about it.’’
He went on to claim that ‘‘in the pre-Independence days, all Congress leaders were using thoughts of cultural nationalism. But, after the advent of pseudo-secularism, political parties started shying away from this nationalist thinking.’’ However, he hastened to add that ‘‘Hindutva is not an election issue.’’
Pseudo-secularists, according to him, are the biggest danger to national integration and ‘‘we should take it as a challenge and defeat them in every form.’’


