After a four-hour meeting at Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s 7 Race Course Road office this evening, the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and leaders of the Left Front finalised the Common Minimum Programme in a spirit of ‘‘give and take.’’ The UPA, which today elected Sonia Gandhi as its chairperson, agreed to many of the Left’s “suggestions” on broad socio-economic issues but retained aspects of the draft CMP on questions relating to privatisation, foreign investment and labour reforms. The final CMP, after fine-tuning by draftsmen on both sides, will be circulated to all alliance partners tomorrow morning and is expected to be formally released in the evening. The Left parties which are supporting the government from the outside and fought hard to get some of their amendments incorporated have decided to “by and large” endorse the CMP, CPI(M) politburo member Sitaram Yechury told journalists after emerging from the meeting. While the CPI(M) will not be signatory to the CMP, it is ready to be part of “some consultative mechanism” to monitor its implementation, party leaders said. While leaders of Congress and Left refused to divulge details of the changes made in the draft CMP, the Left is believed to have extracted concessions in the area of foreign policy, “de-saffronisation” of educational and cultural institutions, a central legislation for agricultural workers, pro-women measures including legislation against domestic violence, and reaffirmation that profit-making PSUs would not be privatised. However, the Congress refused to further water down some of the pro-economic reforms positions contained in the draft CMP despite demands from the CPI(M) and other Left parties, sources said. The CPI(M), at its politburo meeting in Kolkata on Monday, had decided to ask for some key changes in these formulations. For instance, on the issue of labour, the draft CMP had said: ‘‘The UPA rejects the idea of automatic hire and fire. It recognises that some flexibility has to be provided to industry in the matter of labour policy but such flexibility must ensure that workers and their families are fully protected.’’ No one wants a rollback, no one