Premium
This is an archive article published on November 28, 2003

Now, Israel accuses UN of hypocrisy

Israel withdrew a resolution on protecting Israeli children from terrorism, and its ambassador accused the UN of hypocrisy, duplicity and do...

.

Israel withdrew a resolution on protecting Israeli children from terrorism, and its ambassador accused the UN of hypocrisy, duplicity and double standards.

Ambassador Dan Gillerman said on Wednesday that amendments from Egypt and others in a General Assembly committee amounted to a ‘‘hostile takeover’’ of his draft resolution, subverting its purpose, shifting its focus and erasing every reference to Israeli children. ‘‘Today we put the UN to the ultimate moral test,’’ Gillerman said. ‘‘It failed this litmus test miserably. This demonstrated just how far the hypocrisy, duplicity and double standard policy of the General Assembly and its committees go.’’

At issue was Israel’s first introduction of a resolution since 1976, a draft condemning Palestinian suicide bombings against Israeli children. It was meant to mirror a resolution demanding protection for Palestinian children, which was adopted by the panel last week.

Story continues below this ad

Amendments proposed collectively by Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan and others would have substituted ‘‘Middle East’’ for ‘‘Israeli’’ children and inserted language condemning ‘‘foreign occupation’’ and ‘‘violation of international law’’.

Gillerman signalled that Israel, the target of hundreds of critical resolutions, was changing strategy and taking the offensive instead of responding with speeches in the 191-member Assembly that is sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.

In a separate news conference, the Palestinian UN observer Nasser al-Kidwa called the Israeli draft an attempt to divert from the unique situation of Palestinian children, who were deprived of every right included in a 1990 UN treaty on the rights of the child, from the right of statehood to the right of physical protection. General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, as most Security Council resolutions are, but they are a reflection of world opinion. (Reuters)

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement