Premium
This is an archive article published on February 1, 2006

Naga truce gets six-month extension

After playing a game of brinksmanship during the extended four-day dialogue process, the NSCN (I-M) have agreed to a fresh six-month extensi...

.

After playing a game of brinksmanship during the extended four-day dialogue process, the NSCN (I-M) have agreed to a fresh six-month extension of the ceasefire with the Centre on the day the earlier agreement expired.

The government assured them of ‘‘positive and concrete steps towards meeting the just and constitutional demands’’ of the Naga rebels. A joint statement said: ‘‘In view of the need to maintain the congenial atmosphere for political negotiations to fructify, it has been mutually decided to extend the ceasefire by six months with effect from February 1.’’

The statement was signed by the Centre’s interlocuter, K. Padmanabhaiah, and NSCN (I-M) leader Thuingaleng Muivah. Both sides agreed to re-activate and make effective mechanisms to address all ceasefire issues, including modification of ground rules, the statement said.

Story continues below this ad

Recognising that there had been insufficient progress in talks, the two sides decided to carry political negotiations forward and to take new initiatives to resolve the Naga problem, the statement added.

According to sources, the Centre told NSCN(I-M) leaders Muivah and Isak Chisi Swu that there were no secret parleys in progress with the rival Khaplang faction. The government’s emissaries, Padmanabhaiah and senior Congress leader Oscar Fernandes, also told the Nagas that they would make sure that the armed forces were not aiding the NSCN-K.

About the contentious demand for a ‘Greater Nagaland’—which would comprise all Naga-inhabited areas, including parts of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam—the Centre’s representatives told the NSCN(I- M) leaders that they would hold talks with the state governments likely to be affected by the proposed merger.

However, sources said that it was made clear that talks with other states could only be informal, as official talks could foment trouble in the states. ‘‘A mere suggestion of a merger is enough to create unrest in the neighbouring states. So discussions with them would have to be a low key affair,’’ an official disclosed.

Story continues below this ad

The Nagas—under pressure from their cadres for concrete results—told the government that they were looking forward to seeing if the Centre kept its promises over the next six months. Till last year, the ceasefire with the Centre, in effect since 1997, had received an annual extension. However, in July, 2004, the NSCN(IM) agreed only to a six-month extension, which was all they were willing for this time as well.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement