As the Congress high command readies to dump the blame for its defeat in three Assembly bypolls in Rajasthan on PCC chief Girija Vyas, not all in the state unit are impressed. Not Congress heavyweights, at least, who are sounding discordant notes.
This evening, former Chief Minister Shiv Charan Mathur told The Indian Express over the phone: ‘‘The proposed change of guard in state Congress would only be cosmetic. The defeat in the by-elections marks a rejection of government policies by the people. We have surely failed to reach the poor and the downtrodden. Who is responsible for this? Is it the state Congress president? Frankly, we have to analyse the causes for defeats and then take remedial measures.’’
Cong tones up set-up prior to polls Party sources said the measures are part of an attempt to ‘‘energise’’ the state units ahead of the Assembly polls. Similar changes are expected in Delhi, Uttaranchal, Chhattisgarh and Karnataka. Ruling out such changes in MP, party general-secretary Ambika Soni said: ‘‘We had already taken steps to tone up the party functioning in the state and now we find that there is cohesion between the party and the government.’’ She said AICC secretary Daljit Singh will soon submit a district-wise report on Chhattisgarh, suggesting changes in the party set-up. Also, on the anvil is the appointment of a PCC chief for Karanataka. — ENS |
‘‘She (Vyas) can be blamed only to the extent she has contributed to the setbacks. At worst, she can be made to share it with the Chief Minister,’’ he added.
Mathur did not make much of the move to saddle Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot with two deputies, a Rajput and a Jat. ‘‘Caste lobbies have become active to cash in on the situation. Changes made in the nick of time have rarely helped parties in the past. Moreover, the question is which Jat leader has to be propped up. It has to be an established and accepted face.’’
Another former Chief Minister, Heera Lal Deopura, said: ‘‘It is the Government whose performance is on test at by-elections. A negative vote is obviously against the Government. It is not fair to change the PCC president by making her a scapegoat and letting the CM go scot-free. The installation of a new party chief would not make any difference. The high command must undertake an analysis of the poll-outcome.’’
Even octogenarian Nawal Kishore Sharma, who is tipped to succeed Vyas, is not happy with the change. Having been a state Congress president, AICC general secretary and a Union minister earlier, he is obviously not excited. Sources close to him say that Sharma finds the proposed changes ‘‘too little, too late’’.
‘‘They (high command) never heard us during the past four years (of Gehlot’s rule) and now, they suddenly want us to turn the party’s fortunes,’’ he is learnt to have told his aides.
For the record, however, Sharma told The Indian Express: ‘‘I am totally clueless about what is going on. I have only heard from your side (media) that I am being being named the state Congress chief. I am not at all in the queue for any post.’’
‘‘I am not aware of any replacement. It is for the leadership to throw light on the matter,’’ Vyas maintained.
Gehlot, on the other hand, is far from comfortable with Sharma, who can be trusted to work independent of the CM. Sources say Gehlot is pushing the name of his Cabinet colleague Bulaki Dass Kalla, a Brahmin, for party presidency. This clearly means that replacement of Vyas, even if carried through, would certainly not end Sonia Gandhi’s problems in the desert state.