Premium
This is an archive article published on July 13, 2002

Judges should not head inquiries: SC

In a bid to discourage sitting judges from heading inquiries, the Supreme Court today came out with a set of guidelines to govern such appoi...

.

In a bid to discourage sitting judges from heading inquiries, the Supreme Court today came out with a set of guidelines to govern such appointments. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Y.K. Sabharwal and Justice K.G. Balakrishnan deplored the practice of appointing serving judges to various commissions and tribunals saying it affected the independence of the judiciary.

The bench said, ‘‘To maintain the independence of the judiciary, it is not desirable to allocate a judge to a commission or tribunal where the other adjudicating members are non-judges or not qualified to be judges.’’

The court also observed that it was not desirable to send a serving judge even to a judicial tribunal because the judge would come under the disciplinary authority of the executive. The court, however, held three categories of commissions and tribunals as suitable for appointment of serving judges:

• The Finance Commission or the Law Commission;

Story continues below this ad

• Tribunals to adjudicate any intra-state water dispute as provided by Article 262 of the Constitution;

• Commissions constituted under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. The apex court expressed displeasure over the fact that governments were ignoring these reports because of their recommendatory character.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement