Premium
This is an archive article published on January 1, 2008

Irrigation project delays draining state exchequer

Delay in implementing irrigation projects — started between 1970 and 1983...

.

Delay in implementing irrigation projects — started between 1970 and 1983 — has burdened the state exchequer in Jharkhand. Take the case of Gumani project in Sahebgunj. Launched in 1976, it is nowhere near completion. The cost here has gone up from the original estimate of Rs 3.83 crore to Rs 162.58 crore. Swarnarekha multi-purpose project in East Singhbhum district, for instance, has seen an increase of Rs 280.90 crore from Rs 120.89 crore in 1978. And Rs 140.62 crore has already been spent on it. During 2007-08, it was planned that Rs 24 crore would be utilised for the project. Similarly, in the case of Ajay project in Deoghar, the cost has escalated to Rs 351.84 crore from Rs 10.34 crore in 1975. During the last rainy season, the project’s barrage — built at a cost of Rs 254.99 crore — was damaged. To repair it, an additional sum of Rs 23 crore was sanctioned.

The percentage of irrigated land in the state is less than 22 per cent, against the national average of 40 per cent. Once completed, these projects will broaden the size of the state’s irrigated land to 30 per cent. The time overrun for these projects varies between five and 30 years.

Inflation and delay in execution are the key reasons behind the rise in the cost of these projects. As revealed in a recent study — conducted by the state’s Water Resource Department (WRD) — the method for preparing the initial estimate was erroneous. It had no provision for taking into account the price hike during the execution of the project. The WRD’s study on eight projects has estimated that the price inflation alone accounted for 10 to 80 per cent of the total increase in a period of five to 30 years.

Story continues below this ad

Moreover, none of the contractors, who were engaged in implementing the projects, had done their job. Each of them was awarded tender by following procedures that took a long time. Worse, since the sites of these projects were located in remote areas and suffered from infrastructural disabilities, mobilisation of resources took a long time too. Besides, the cost of land acquisition turned out to be much higher than projected in the estimate. In addition, poor performance on the part of contractors and disputes requiring arbitration contributed towards the delay.

Although the Government has no plans for overcoming these problems, D K Tiwari, Secretary (WRD) said that efforts were being made to get all these projects, except Swarnarekha, completed by 2010. “To minimise the time and cost overrun, we are planning to adopt e-tender procedure,” he added.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement