
Reaffirming its trust in a special team from Maharashtra which is probing the fake stamp scandal, the Bombay High Court on Thursday kept on hold a decision to hand over the case to the CBI.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice C K Thakker and Justice Abhay Oka, however, asked the investigators to cooperate with the central agency which is investigating the racket in other states.
|
Sharma being wrongly targeted: Counsel
|
|||||
|
MUMBAI: Investigators are 8216;8216;wrongly8217;8217; targeting R.S. Sharma for lapses in the Telgi investigation despite evidence suggesting the involvement of many senior policemen and ministers in the scam, the former Mumbai police commissioner8217;s counsel told the Bombay High Court on Thursday. V.R. Manohar said the names figuring in a diary of scam mastermind Abdul Karim Telgi include that of ministers and several top police officials across 17 states. While accusing the Special Investigation Team SIT of 8216;8216;settling8217;8217; personal scores with Sharma. ENS |
|||||
The order to let the Special Investigation Team SIT headed by retired DGP S S Puri continue with the investigation came in the face of arguments by Additional Solicitor General Shirish Gupte representing the CBI, who said that since the scam was spread over 17 states, 8216;8216;CBI will be in a better position8217;8217; to handle the probe.
Gupte however, added that the CBI had no problems with the SIT handling the probe, but expressed the agency8217;s willingness to take over if the high court asked it to. He said the CBI8217;s earlier stand, presented by his predecessor S B Jaisinghani, was an error.
Even Advocate General Goolam Vahanvati told the court that the state had no objection to the CBI taking over the case. But Vahanvati also referred to an earlier hearing of the high court in which Jaisinghani had produced a letter from the CBI to the effect that it was over burdened with cases and therefore was not interested in taking up the probe.
He also read out an affidavit filed in July by state Home Secretary U K Mukhopadhya who had attended a meeting in New Delhi where it was decided that CBI would not take up the fake stamp paper probe in Maharashtra as it was overburdened and that the Union Home Ministry would form a committee to coordinate between the CBI and SIT.
Majeed Memon described the CBI8217;s desire to take over the probe as a 8216;8216;volte face8217;8217;. He told the court that the agency had earlier washed its hands off the probe by maintaining that 8216;8216;it was short of the requisite manpower to carry out the investigations8217;8217;.
Memon stated since SIT was 8216;8216;doing excellent work,8217;8217; it be allowed to continue with its investigations. He added that the state8217;s desire to hand over the case to CBI smacks of 8216;8216;political motivations.8217;8217;
The division bench asked the CBI to wait for some time and observed that it won8217;t pass any order at this juncture. It would consider passing appropriate orders to hand over the probe at an appropriate stage, the judges said. The case will be next heard on January 16.
| nbsp; |
FROM SIT REPORT: EX-COMMISSIONER8217;S NINE DEADLY SINS
|
||||
| nbsp; |
EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE Former Mumbai police commissioner R.S. Sharma is 8216;8216;guilty of woeful dereliction of duty, poor professional response and failure to personally intervene and take immediate correctives in several situations.8217;8217; Story continues below this ad Eight of Sharma8217;s nine acts of 8216;8216;omission and commission,8217;8217; which the Special Investigation Team SIT has mentioned in a report, are mentioned in the chargesheet. Details of the charges were first reported by NDTV 24215;7. The charges against Sharma are: 8226; He failed to personally intervene and take immediate corrective steps while filing a chargesheet and applying the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act MCOCA in the case. He was commissioner in Pune where the first case was registered by on June 7, 2002. 8226; He failed to look at the case papers when then additional commissioner crime S.M. Mushriff alleged that names had been included and deleted from the chargesheet. 8226; Asoke Basak, additional chief secretary Home, told Sharma about the bribe demanded by ACP Mulani, a member of the investigating team in Pune. Sharma did not remove Mulani from the team. Story continues below this ad 8226; Sharma failed to restore command and control when differences surfaced between Additional Commissioner Mushriff and the investigating officer. 8226; As commissioner of Pune, Sharma knew that the joint commissioner and additional commissioner had scuttled a proposal to apply MCOCA, and when they eventually applied it, the charges were framed in a defective manner. But Sharma didn8217;t rectify the defects. 8226; DIG Subodh Jaiswal of SIT and Sri Kumar, additional director general of Karnataka Police, briefed Sharma on January 9, 2003 when they found Telgi at his Cuffe Parade flay instead of being in police custody. Sharma as Mumbai commissioner had ordered the suspension of assistant inspector Dilip Kamath, officer in charge, but failed to ensure compliance of his orders. 8226; An officer from the CID8217;s MCOCA cell had submitted to then joint commissioner S S Vagal a report regarding scrutiny of cases of counterfeit stamps registered in Mumbai since 1991. Vagal later arrested in the case was member of a special task force formed to investigate the case while Sharma was its chairman. Sharma failed to clean the force on the basis of details available with Vagal. Story continues below this ad 8226; Sri Kumar, had on March 4, 2003, communicated information regarding bail granted to Telgi in a case registered in Mumbai. Sharma merely initialled the letter which later went to Vagal. Sharma failed to promptly neutralise the functionaries responsible for allowing Telgi to obtain bail on flimsy grounds. |
nbsp; | |||