
Sketches of refugees at train stations and graphic depictions of the suffering done post-Partition express with immediacy the angst of that time.
Artists such as Delhi-based Krishen Khanna and Satish Gujral who actually lived through Partition, reacted to this seminal moment in subcontinental history in their works. But 57 years after Independence, artists pussyfoot around this 8216;sensitive8217; socio-political issue, and bold voices are few and far between.
8216;8216;It8217;s more difficult to talk about Partition because the role of perpetrators and victims was a reversible one. It8217;s impossible to 8216;blame8217; any one side,8217;8217; says artist Nalini Malani, 57, whose parents left Sindh for Pune after 1947 and who, like her mother, kept silent for years. Until she responded to the threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan in 1999 with her installation 8216;Remembering Toba Tek Singh8217;.
Black and white archival images of confused people and animals running for their life. A winking soldier comparing the mushroom cloud of Hiroshima to a woman8217;s figure. Digitally manipulated images of babies being born only to retreat into their mother8217;s womb.
The installation was shown in Delhi and Mumbai and six years later she8217;s considering recreating the work, 8216;8216;because this is something one continues to revisit.8217;8217;
Some artists have not been directly touched by Partition but feel the need to speak up nevertheless. Forty-year-old Atul Dodiya8217;s 8216;Gandhi8217; series from the 8216;50 Years of Independence8217; show and his 8216;An Artist of Non-violence8217; exhibition directly address the issue.
8216;8216;In my watercolour 8216;A Painful Resolution8217;, I have five political giants8212;Nehru, Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Sardar Patel, Maulana Azad and Gandhi8212;standing at a historic moment of Hindu-Muslim harmony,8217;8217; says Dodiya, referring to this moment as the lull before a storm.
While Dodiya engages with the subject, other artists cite many reasons for steering clear of it. For Mumbai-based Bose Krishnamachari, who is in his mid-forties, Partition would have been more relevant if he belonged to an earlier generation of artists.
8216;8216;I am not emotionally untouched by the issue, but it does not figure in my works because I don8217;t think art can change politics,8217;8217; he says.
Baiju Parthan, Krishnamachari8217;s contemporary, says he has avoided the subject because of its overtly nationalistic or political nature.
8216;8216;I don8217;t do heavily ideological work because it becomes propagandist,8217;8217; he says. 8216;8216;Besides, I think it also depends where one is geographically located. Since I come from southern India, I don8217;t know how far it would be relevant if I respond to it.8217;8217;
Gupta undertook a cross-border exchange of poster art with Pakistani artist Huma Mulji titled 8216;Aar Paar8217;, which started in 1999 and had a show in 20048212;the third in the series. Posters from Pakistan were put up at strategic points in Mumbai and the same was done across the border with the Indian posters.
Shah, a video artist, based her current digital film on the experience of travelling in a train along the Indo-Pak border. Upadhyay recently visited Pakistan for a residency program. 8216;8216;The border is just a line in our heads,8217;8217; she says. 8216;8216;When I went to Pakistan, I found that things weren8217;t all that different. We just tend to become victims of so many stereotypes.8217;8217;
It8217;s a relief that things have improved where Indo-Pak relations are concerned, but 8216;8216;Partition is not something one should be silenced about,8217;8217; says Malani, 8216;8216;since revisiting is a reminder that one should never want another carnage.8221;