Premium
This is an archive article published on December 6, 1997

Gawli’s bail plea rejected

MUMBAI, December 5: Additional Sessions Judge S R Mehra, today rejected the bail plea of underworld don Arun Gawli and also dismissed his d...

.

MUMBAI, December 5: Additional Sessions Judge S R Mehra, today rejected the bail plea of underworld don Arun Gawli and also dismissed his discharge application from the Natwarlal Desai murder case.

While rejecting both the discharge and bail applications, the judge also observed that there was circumstantial evidence against Gawli, who is alleged to have masterminded the murder on August 19, 1997.

At present, Gawli is detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Persons, Slumlords, Bootleggers and Drug Offenders (MPDA) Act at Amravati Central Jail. He was brought from there and produced before the court amidst tight security, following orders issued by Mehra on December 1, 1997.

Story continues below this ad

The judge had expressed displeasure at the fact that court orders were constantly being violated. After perusing the report of the Liaison officer about his communication with jail authorities at Amravati and Arthur Road, he had remarked, “It is astonishing that despite clear orders of the court that the accused shall be produced before today, the jail authorities have not done so.”

The police and jail authorities had failed to produce Gawli in the City Civil and Sessions Court on at least four occasions despite a summons issued to that effect. They had maintained that a proper escort party was not available to bring Gawli to the city, and there were chances of untoward incidents taking place on the way.

The matter had to be adjourned thrice as the police continued to claim lack of adequate escort party which could safely bring Gawli to Mumbai. Arguing on Gawli’s behalf, lawyer Ashok Patil pleaded that his client should be discharged because the only evidence against him was a diary recovered from the pocket of the deceased Desai which mentioned the word `A G’.

Patil said the police had made out a case against him as they presumed this to be Gawli’s initials. A similar kind of evidence was also produced in the Jain hawala case, in which the accused were ultimately discharged, Patil contended. But the court felt that at this stage, Gawli’s plea for bail or discharge could not be granted.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement