Premium
This is an archive article published on October 13, 2002

Faded and Forgotten

RAJA Raja Chola, the king who built the Brihadisvara temple was a brilliant military strategist and a lover of art and literature. The pictu...

.

RAJA Raja Chola, the king who built the Brihadisvara temple was a brilliant military strategist and a lover of art and literature. The picture of Raja Raja Chola and his guru Karuvurar is one of the few images of the 11th century paintings that are published whenever the paintings in the Brihadisvara temple in Thanjavur are discussed. The remainder of the wall paintings are much too damaged to be printed effectively.

Above the sanctum sanctorum where the giant lingam reposes in the Brihadisvara, is a four-sided passageway, painted by the Cholas, dealing with stories about Lord Shiva. The passageway is covered by another floor and protected by outer walls. The paintings must have been exquisite, for they retain their beauty even in their very damaged state. These paintings belong to India’s great wall painting tradition as do the Ajanta (2 BC -6 AD), Bagh (5th century) and Sittanavasal (7th century) paintings. The Bagh paintings are practically gone while the time bomb has started to tick for the others.

The Nayakas who ruled over Thanjavur in the 16th century covered the Chola paintings with rather inferior paintings of their own. The Archaeological Survey of India implemented a rather risky method of separating the two layers of painting from each other. A written account mentions the protection of the top layer of Nayak paintings with cloth and paper and then continues by saying that ‘‘two incisions equal in depth to the thickness of the layer to be detached were carefully made with knife that no mark or scratch on the underneath layer occurred’’. When I first saw these paintings several years ago I was puzzled to see deep horizontal and vertical cuts in the Chola paintings that reached the granite wall on which they had been painted and wondered how that had happened. The paintings were protected by the walls around them so there was no danger there. Visitors require permission to enter and are never without an escort; photography is allowed with great reluctance. Where then, did these cuts come from? And why do the paintings look as though they have been rubbed away almost to the point of non-existence? There is no evidence of dampness which could have been a factor to reckon with, neither has Mr A K Seshadri, has not made any mention of it in his book on Brihadisvara. He seems content to say that they (ASI) have ‘‘done a marvellous job in sparing no pains to strip off and expose the original Chola paintings’’. About the Nayaka paintings he says that they ‘‘are not clearly visible as most of them have either fallen of faded’’. Faded? Where there is no light? And how did they fall? Were there environmental reasons or clumsy human intervention? I spent two days trying to locate the peeled off Nayaka paintings but was thwarted by no keys, no custodian, no idea where they were, no permission. I am left with many questions and no true answers. Lack of professionalism and training leads to obscure responses; knowledge and expertise make way for clarity and communication.

— Write to rupikachawla@

expressindia.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement