Premium
This is an archive article published on August 26, 2004

Dr Singh, Xiaoping and China

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was probably taking a leaf out of Deng Xiaoping Thought when he spoke at the JRD Tata commemorations in the ca...

.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was probably taking a leaf out of Deng Xiaoping Thought when he spoke at the JRD Tata commemorations in the capital on Tuesday. Lamenting the tyranny of the ‘‘inspector raj’’, Singh pointed out that while there were 31 inspectors to clear one factory in India, there were only six in China. The PM’s message, just like Deng’s to China 25 years ago, was that there was no staying away from the irrevocable trend of globalisation.

China’s websites are, in fact, flooded with their own eulogies to Deng on his hundredth birth anniversary that fell on August 23. The Theory of Deng Xiaoping, the People’s Daily pointed out, consists of easily understandable phrases that people can remember without reference to books or dictionaries. Such as, ‘‘Development is of overriding importance’’, ‘‘Science & technology is the primary productive force’’ and ‘‘Poverty is not Socialism’’. (The last may be especially applicable to India.)

But there’s another Deng phrase called the ‘‘peaceful rise of China’’ (‘‘heping juechi’’ in Mandarin) that is currently in the eye of the storm back in China and under attack from another phrase, ‘‘the peaceful development of China’’ (‘‘heping fanjian’’), which is propagated by another school of thought. Clearly, we haven’t heard the last of the ongoing internal political struggle in Asia’s most powerful nation.

Seeing Red in Nepal

Story continues below this ad

Believing that power cannot be won from the barrel of a gun, India has so far largely ignored the Maoist insurgents in Nepal—except for the time during the peace talks last year when Babu Ram Bhattarai met a senior official in the Indian Embassy. But as the Maoists have been able to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that they are able to bring life to a standstill wherever they choose—such as in the Kathmandu valley in the last week—an alternative view may perhaps be beginning to emerge in New Delhi. According to this school of thought, the Maoists may have a number of progressive ideas, especially on the socio-economic front, that all sides must look at seriously. At the same time, the Maoists must be told that it isn’t possible to overthrow the existing dispensation in Nepal, whether it is the constitutional monarchy or the political parties. And in fact, if they wait much longer to arrive at a reasonable compromise, the international community (read India, the US) could get its act together and seriously apply both military and political pressure.

Meanwhile, a senior UNICEF official, a Nepali citizen called Kul Gautam, who believes the UN should get more seriously involved in Nepal, has been doing the rounds in Delhi, meeting people from key political parties. Problem is, the Foreign Office completely shuns a role for the UN in Nepal.

Maldives: the Islam connection

New Delhi’s continuing relationship with the Abdul Gayoom dispensation in Maldives reveals more and more interesting facts. When former PM A B Vajpayee visited Male in September 2002, he announced that two historic mosques had been given money by the then NDA government for ‘‘renovation’’. One of the mosques, Fenfushi, had been completely renovated at the time of Vajpayee’s visit, while another, the ‘Dharmavantha Raskefanu’, was soon going to be. Perhaps the NDA government was underlining its multi-religious credentials by offering to renovate the mosques. Interestingly, one of the excuses the Gayoom government gives, especially to foreign leaders like US Secretary of State Colin Powell who stopped by in Male last month, for his emergency is that the Opposition he has banned includes ‘‘radical Islamists’’.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement