WORKING with a pen or a typewriter has the disadvantage of messy cancellations whenever there is a mind change. This is not the case with a pencil and the effective eraser or the computer with its many ways of deletion. But to change one’s mind or to remove a mistake gets complex when applied to a painting and its creative process.
There can be several moments in the making of a painting when the artist wishes to do something other than what has been done or perhaps even change the painting altogether. It can involve, for example, the shifting of the tilt of a head or the angle of an arm; it can imply changing one’s mind about a drawing made on the canvas, paper or wall and then painting differently from the drawing that exists. A painter can also wish to change the positioning of figures or make things disappear that are no longer required.
Gums and glues used in water-based paintings do not become as transparent as oils do. The emergence of pentimento in such paintings is infrequent but it exists. This probably also happens because the covering layer of paint is not opaque enough to hide the alteration. The detail of a Jamini Roy tempera painting demonstrates the point. Several of Amrita Sher-Gil’s paintings have instances of pentimenti, making it apparent that she continuously altered elements in her paintings. Siesta (a two inch band near the trees), Woman Holding Fan (alteration around the face), Hillside (trees moved around) are a few examples. Perhaps Sher-Gil was a passionate and impetuous painter much as she was a woman, which is probably the reason why she impatiently moved her paintings around.
Pentimento exists under the paint layer and no attempt should be made to remove it. It is also an indication of the authenticity of a painting and the intricacy of the creative process.
The author can be contacted at rupikachawla@expressindia.com