Premium
This is an archive article published on October 16, 2000

Death in a pouch

If nobody today seriously contests the fact that tobacco smoking is injurious to health, it is only because a strong consumer movement had...

.

If nobody today seriously contests the fact that tobacco smoking is injurious to health, it is only because a strong consumer movement had the courage to take on that Goliath — big tobacco interests. So successful has the anti-smoking campaign been in the West that it has brought tobacco companies on their knees, deglamorised smoking, driven smokers into specially marked zones, ensured that cigarette packets and ads carry health warnings and rendered the once-macho figure of the Marlboro Man into a skeletal, cancerous caricature of himself. And, remember, much of this action took place in that citadel of the free market: The US of A.

It is useful to recall this bit of social history when confronted with the dangers of another addictive substance that is now as ubiquitous as tapped water in India: gutkha or chewing tobacco. On Saturday, this newspaper highlighted the story of Haresh Vishrolia, a carpenter from Rajkot, who has taken the Gujarat government to court for having failed to effectively alert citizens to the health hazards of consuming gutkha. Vishrolia should know. Years of consuming it has left him with a virulent oral cancer that has already claimed 70 per cent of his tongue. The big question of course is whether Vishrolia’s crusade will fructify into anything substantial. The country has walked this path before. A couple of years ago the Rajasthan High Court had responded to a similar writ and directed the Union government to ascertain whether pan chewing is injurious to health and, if so, ban it forthwith. What followed was a familiar procedure. A committee was duly formed; the committee duly wrote a report; the report wasduly buried.

There is really no need to re-discover the causal link between chewing pan and cancer. As far back as 1902, a British doctor attached to the Madras General Hospital had established that tobacco chewing causes cancer. What is needed is to regulate, if not ban, the multi-crore gutkha industry, which has registered a dramatic increase in its presence through some skillful advertising, the use of celebrity endorsement and innovative packaging. Children are especially vulnerable to tobacco addiction and peddlers of gutkha have no compunctions about selling their products outside schools, resulting in 10- and 11-year-olds becoming addicts. There is, therefore, an urgent need to launch an effective outreach programme to drive home the dismal truths about tobacco consumption and at least some of the revenue the government earns from gutkha sales must be channelised for this purpose. For starters, packets should prominently carry the categorical message that consuming gutkha causes cancer.

Cancer is an extremely difficult and expensive disease to treat, something that a country like India can ill afford. The Indian Council of Medical Research has estimated the cost of treating tobacco-related diseases at Rs 25,000 crore, a figure that quite puts in the shade the excise earnings that the industry generates. These costs will only rise over the years. The World Health Organisation has estimated that tobacco will be responsible for 13.3 per cent of all deaths in India by the year 2020. As the world’s nations attempt to negotiate an international framework convention on tobacco control at Geneva, this is perhaps the right time to do some straight talking on gutkha back home.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement