Arguably India’s greatest-ever athlete, Gurbachan Singh Randhawa, whose greatest moment was finishing fifth in the 110m hurdles at the Tokyo Olympics in 1964, was also the first winner of the Arjuna Award. That was in 1961; 42 years down the line, the Awards seem to have changed in spirit and character.
Randhawa clearly isn’t happy with the way things are. What irks him is the high number of awards given out every year. ‘‘No value is left at all in these awards’’, he told The Indian Express. ‘‘I can assure you that if the money and the incentives were stopped, no one would lobby for it. And there should be one award for each discipline every year, otherwise we’ll soon run out of decent people to confer it on.’’
Randhawa feels that what needs to be done is that ‘‘unambiguous rules should be put in place. Criteria should be defined. Announcements don’t need to be done beforehand. Just present them to the ones who have been chosen. These things have spoilt the worth of Indian sports as a whole.’’
‘‘In our time, we used to feel honoured to win the Arjuna award. There was no monetary benefit in those days. We earned it for our hard work and our chests would swell with pride.’’
The fact that this year’s Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award went jointly to shooter Anjali Bhagwat and runner K Beenamol hasn’t gone down well with him either. Especially because Beenamol was originally named the recipient, and Bhagwat, as has been widely reported, lobbied till her name was included. ‘‘No one is supposed to lobby for the awards anyway,’’ Randhawa says. ‘‘In my opinion, Anjali deserved it more than Beenamol if it had to be between the two of them. She has done better at the world level, whereas Beenamol’s greatest achievements have been at the Asian level. But even then, if one person has been selected, that should be accepted. And more than one Khel Ratna award shouldn’t be given.’’