
The Ashes was probably the most-watched cricket series not involving India. It reduced the Tri-series in Zimbabwe to an irrelevance and proved such a hard act to follow that the Bulawayo Test gave up without even trying or maybe it did, we8217;d stopped caring by then.
Yet for us in India 8212; fans, media, cricketers, administrators 8212; the 25 days of cricket was worth more than just entertainment value. Here, in no particular order, are four things our cricket could learn from the game8217;s oldest contest:
THE POWER OF ONE
The best team is not a collection of the most talented players but 11 people playing as one. From the very first ball of the series at Lord8217;s, right through till bad light stopped play at The Oval, England8217;s cricket was all about unity. In our minds, Flintoff was the star; in his own mind he was the same as his teammates. And in that unity lay England8217;s best weapon.
TEST IS BEST
This was cricket as it was meant to be played: A five-day game of chess, with enough time to think and analyse, plot, regroup, a test of each team8217;s powers of attack and counter, demanding as much of brain as of brawn. Glorious, gritty Test cricket, which our money-centric, short-sighted cricket administrators and narrow-minded, star-gazing public have rudely elbowed aside.
SPECTATORS, SPORT!
TIME FOR THE AXE
This one8217;s still in the works: How will Australia respond to losing the Ashes? They showed the world how to build a team, by giving players repeated chances till they finally succeeded. They8217;ve also shown they aren8217;t averse to the occasional shooting of a star, as Messrs Taylor and Waugh will testify. Now comes the tough part: To tread the balance between what needs to be done and what the public wants done.
8212; Jayaditya Gupta