The Ashes was probably the most-watched cricket series not involving India. It reduced the Tri-series in Zimbabwe to an irrelevance and proved such a hard act to follow that the Bulawayo Test gave up without even trying (or maybe it did, we’d stopped caring by then).
Yet for us in India — fans, media, cricketers, administrators — the 25 days of cricket was worth more than just entertainment value. Here, in no particular order, are four things our cricket could learn from the game’s oldest contest:
THE POWER OF ONE
The best team is not a collection of the most talented players but 11 people playing as one. From the very first ball of the series at Lord’s, right through till bad light stopped play at The Oval, England’s cricket was all about unity. In our minds, Flintoff was the star; in his own mind he was the same as his teammates. And in that unity lay England’s best weapon.
TEST IS BEST
This was cricket as it was meant to be played: A five-day game of chess, with enough time to think and analyse, plot, regroup, a test of each team’s powers of attack and counter, demanding as much of brain as of brawn. Glorious, gritty Test cricket, which our money-centric, short-sighted cricket administrators and narrow-minded, star-gazing public have rudely elbowed aside.
SPECTATORS, SPORT!
TIME FOR THE AXE
This one’s still in the works: How will Australia respond to losing the Ashes? They showed the world how to build a team, by giving players repeated chances till they finally succeeded. They’ve also shown they aren’t averse to the occasional shooting of a star, as Messrs Taylor and Waugh will testify. Now comes the tough part: To tread the balance between what needs to be done and what the public wants done.
— Jayaditya Gupta