Premium
This is an archive article published on November 22, 1998

Call for product patent review

MUMBAI, Nov 21: Greatest caution must be exercised while designing a patent system, said Dr Dinesh Patel, president of Indian Drug Manufactu...

.

MUMBAI, Nov 21: Greatest caution must be exercised while designing a patent system, said Dr Dinesh Patel, president of Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA) at Chemtech World Chemcom’98 seminar.

There is a need to review the strong product patent protection system like Trips and modern systems to promote research and development. He said the patent law that will be drafted should ensure that any monopoly granted for commercial exploitation of a product do not block or prevent R&D and experimental activities.

While accepting the fact that new chemical entities (NCEs) involves high cost and time, the justification for strong patent regimes does not hold true for other claims. As against an average of 50 NCEs developed a year, the number of patent claims runs into thousands.

Story continues below this ad

This shows that NCE invention are only a very small fragment of total pharma research. Thus he argued that a law can not be designed to protect 50 NCEs’ and close the door to R&D of thousands of other innovations andimprovements.

During the 10 year period 1982 to 1991, patent protection which was progressively strengthened and R&D costs multiplied, in almost all advanced countries the number of NCEs brought out has decreased. Out of more than 80 countries having strong product patent regimes, during the last two decades or more only 8 countries developed NCEs’.

Patel said that modern patent regimes allows for the patenting of discoveries as well as inventions. This covers claims on products of nature and living beings including micro-organisms and animals. They also allow for patenting of new uses and new combinations of known drugs with insignificant changes in strengths and having virtually the same effects. Modern patents also allows for widest coverage for claims giving full scope to the `doctrine of equivalence’.

Herein millions of compounds are claimed just on the basis of the development and disclosure of only a couple of compounds.

Story continues below this ad

Patel said that the impact of such a strong product patent regimes wouldblock efforts in pharma R&D. By granting exclusive rights, not only for an original molecule but also for thousands of compounds, all analogues, esters, salts, molecular substitutions, formulations and even their uses would be reserved exclusively for the patentee for both R&D and commercial use.

The patentee can keep on extending this monopoly, by successively and periodically claiming patents for molecular substitution products, salts, esters, formulations and their uses and even different forms. Ranitidine — form 1 and form 2 is a case in the point. Pressing on the point, Patel said that in the last 70 years research in modern drugs has progressed very fast with discoveries of important drugs like penicillin etc.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement