Premium
This is an archive article published on September 6, 2000

Buoyed by lawyers’ stir, five cities lay claim to Chhattisgarh HC

BHOPAL, SEPT 5: Intense lobbying for the location of Chhattisgarh's capital and high court has marked the eve of an all-party meet called ...

.

BHOPAL, SEPT 5: Intense lobbying for the location of Chhattisgarh’s capital and high court has marked the eve of an all-party meet called in Bhopal on September 6 to discuss the location of these and other institutions of the new state. All MPs and MLAs from the region are expected to attend.

After a meeting of the Chief Secretaries of Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and UP called by the Union Home Secretary in New Delhi last week, it seemed that a consensus had emerged in favour of Raipur as the state capital and Bilaspur as the seat of the Chhattisgarh High Court. However, the consensus appears to have broken down following agitations and counter-agitations by lawyers of five major cities of Chhattisgarh over the location of the new high court. The confusion has been confounded by lawyers Jabalpur — the principal seat of the present MP High Court — who are opposing the creation of a separate high court for Chhattisgarh itself. Their counterparts in Raipur, Durg, Raigarh and Bilaspur have started agitating to press the claims of their respective cities for the high court seat.

Today’s bandh in all five cities was also called to ensure that their demands are not ignored at tomorrow’s all-party meeting.

Story continues below this ad

Raipur, Bilaspur and Bastar are the three divisional headquarters of the 16 Madhya Pradesh districts which will form part of the new state and politicians from each region want that at least some state level institutions — if not the state capital itself — should be located in their area.

During the initial euphoria after the passage of the States Reorganisation Bill for Chhattisgarh, politicians from Bilaspur had indicated their willingness to concede the state capital to Raipur. But they wanted the high court to be located in their city as part of the bargain. But the Raipur lawyers’ 15-day-long agitation for the high court has now altered the situation. “It’s logical that the state capital and the high court should be located in one city,” says Kishore Bhaduri, general secretary of the Raipur Bar Association. He relies on the Justice Jaswant Singh Committee’s earlier recommendation in favour of a bench of the MP High Court being set up in Raipur.

Yesterday, Raipur lawyers gheraoed Union Minister of State Ramesh Bais and forced him to concede that he would support the demand for the high court to be located in the state capital. Madhya Pradesh Minister Dhanendra Sahu — also from Raipur — has endorsed the BJP leader’s stand.

This led to strong reactions from other parts of Chhattisgarh. Bilaspur lawyers have launched a counter-agitation and are now pressing their politicians to fight for their city to be the state capital as well. “The city is right in the middle of the state and people from all parts,” argues Madhya Pradesh Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rajendra Prasad Shukla, espousing Bilaspur’s case.

Story continues below this ad

Meanwhile, lawyers in Raigarh and Durg have launched separate agitations to ensure that at least a division bench of the high court be set up in their areas. The state’s Jail Minister and tribal leader Mahendra Karma, on the other hand, wants at least a division bench of the new high court to be in yet another place — Jagdalpur town of Bastar division.

However, few Chhattisgarh Congress leaders aspiring to be the new state’s first chief minister wish to be involved in the controversy. “These questions will be sorted out by the people of Chhattisgarh without much problem,” says AICC spokesman Ajit Jogi. For a change, BJP veteran from Chhattisgarh, Lakhi Ram Agarwal, agrees with him.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement