If Shilpa Shetty had encountered indecent behaviour on an Indian TV channel, she (along with the programme) would have been AXN-ed by I&B Minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi on the first day. If AXN was axed for indecency, should Simon Cowell be taken off air for calling a contestant on the latest edition of American Idol “one of those creatures in the jungle with massive eyes’’? And if we are offended by Cowell’s remark, outraged by gratuitous insults to the colour of Shetty’s skin, enough to burn effigies (as BBC Radio reported), then should we also burn down the factories that produce Fair and Lovely cream?
By the same token, if Dasmunshi thinks World’s Sexiest Commercials on AXN are unfit for consumption by the human eye and soul, then so are hundreds of film “item’’ numbers featuring actors like Aishwarya or Bipasha. And what of the bones of little dead children from Nithari? Are those wholesome viewing?
Tell you what, if we must play Mr Disapproving Scissorhands, let’s simply snip off the cable wire and rid ourselves of this obscenity called TV altogether.
Whether or not Jade Goody’s “racist’’ behaviour towards Shilpa, earns TV show Big Brother an unceremonious eviction is irrelevant. What we should wonder about is the criterion by which evictions/bans are judged and decided. It appears as though Channel 4 is taking a decision on the same basis that governs the show — by the numbers of protest ‘votes’. Then suppose 38,000 or whatever the current figure may be, had not voiced their disapproval, would that have made Jade Goody’s behaviour acceptable?
Reality TV is about appeal, not sex appeal (Munshi has banned that) but viewers’ sympathetic empathy. That’s why so many contestants cry so much; that’s why most of the time they clap so hard for the other contestants. That’s why they smile and bow and scrape and say pretty thank-you even when they want to assault the judges for low marks or critical comments. You have to act the part of a good sport even if you’re really a crab “scuttling’’ as T.S. Eliot put it, “the floors of silent seas’’.
All good drama requires extraordinary situations or events — and reality shows are all about drama. Also vile, negative characters (ask Ekta Kapoor) who make unpalatable, statements (some of which are true). Thus, talent reality show always feature versions of Simon Cowell who are paid to be horrid (and sometimes truthful) and create conflict (another elementary feature of drama). The Indian shows picked up the idea, so you have the fisticuffs and the walkouts by judges on Sa Re Ga Ma Pa.
Big Brother goes one step further — it features the good, the bad but banks on the ugly. Imagine if Rakhi, Ravi, Rahul was all sweety pie on Bigg Boss — would you watch them? No, there’s Carol for that.
In order to involve the public enough to make them vote you have to do what Salman Rushdie said about good novels — make them engage with the characters (NDTV 24×7) — love, like or hate them. Nobody tutored Jade to utter racial or sexual obscenities; but she was chosen because she can be obscene. Just as Shilpa was picked to play the civilised dark-skinned babe who’d make Jade see red, sorry brown. Just that Jade went too far and made everyone feel small about Big Brother.
KBC: Didn’t get the point of opening dance video featuring Shah Rukh; found his clothes dandy, his mannerisms and delivery very Big Brother Bachchan-ish, his manners and modesty charming, his high fives juvenile, his flair for languages a revelation, his back massage hmmmn (?), his guests below par, his brand promotion wonderful (Compaq da) — the whole thing too rehearsed but cute (too cute) and let’s give him a chance.