Premium
This is an archive article published on September 6, 2022

UP opposes Siddique Kappan bail plea, tells SC: He is PFI think tank, advised hit squad

The STF also accused him of suppressing facts in his bail plea.

Kerala-based journalist Siddique Kappan. (File)
Kerala-based journalist Siddique Kappan. (File)

Opposing Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan’s bail plea, the Uttar Pradesh Police that arrested him under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act-1967 has told the Supreme Court that “investigation has revealed that petitioner is the think tank of PFI (Popular Front of India)” and had even “advised” one of the two PFI “hit squad” members arrested with explosives in Lucknow in February last year.

In an affidavit filed in the top court in response to a notice on Kappan’s plea on August 29, the UP Police Special Task Force (STF), which is investigating the case, said that Ansad Badruddin, “a close associate” of Kappan, and “one Firoz (both co-accused) were arrested in Lucknow with explosives”, adding, they were the “hit squad” of the PFI who were funded by Rauf Sharif (national general secretary of CFI, PFI’s student wing) and Kamal K P, and were advised by the petitioner to “target Hindu organisations…”

The ED, it claimed, “has found Sharif to be the main fundraiser and money launderer of the CFI, which utilised Sharif’s account …lakhs [rupees] of money was transferred to Sharif’s account from abroad and then funneled into illegal and terrorist activities in India. Interrogations of Sharif detailed the entire money trail; how it was laundered and what terrorist/unlawful acts it was used towards. One such trail was of the money transferred to co-accused Atiq-ur-Rahman to hire the cab to take the CFI delegation to Hathras on 05.10.2020”.

Story continues below this ad

Kappan and three others, were arrested in Mathura on October 5, 2020, while they were on their way to Hathras, where a Dalit woman had died after she was allegedly gangraped. They were booked under the UAPA and on charges of sedition.

Kappan had claimed that he was employed with a web portal ‘Azhimukham’ which had “deputed” him to go to Hathras to report on the incident, but the STF sought to contradict him, saying, “the statement of the Editor of Azhimukham…nowhere states that the said publication had deputed the petitioner to cover the Hathras incident; it merely states that the petitioner had at 12.10am on 5.10.2022, sent the office a WhatsApp message that he is going to Hathras”.

It added that “the official Twitter handle of the CFI had tweeted in February 2021: Campus Front delegation was arrested en route to Hathras and falsely charged with draconian laws…” The STF also accused him of suppressing facts in his bail plea.

Kappan, it said, had stated he was “employed” in Saudi Arabia from 2002-2011, and that he had quit the job in 2011 and returned to Kerala where he “opted to join as a sub-editor of Thejas newspaper at Kozhikode”, but had not revealed that in Saudi too, “he was a reporter for Gulf Thejas Daily, Jeddah…”

Story continues below this ad

It said that “Thejas is a Malayalam language mouthpiece of the PFI…” and “was compelled to shut down in India in 2018 amidst reports (including by a Kerala High Court-appointed independent committee) that the paper’s coverage was aimed at creating religious discord”.

The affidavit also disputed Kappan’s claim about money found in his account. It pointed out that he claimed that Rs 25,000 deposited in his account on September 15, 2020, “was money deposited by him which he had saved to construct a house” and that Rs 20,000 deposited on October 4, 2020, “was money that had been borrowed by friends and returned to him”.

“However, in his supplementary rejoinder before the High Court (which rejected his bail plea), the petitioner states that “the alleged payments made to the applicant are relating to his salary paid for working at Thejas Daily,” the STF affidavit said, adding “thus, there is a clear contradiction in the petitioner’s version of source of the said funds”.

The STF also said there are as many as 55 witnesses, including 11 public witnesses to be examined in the case and that “there is a grave and credible threat to the lives of these witnesses, who are already being targeted online for deposing against the petitioner”.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement