Premium
This is an archive article published on March 22, 2024

Ponmudy sworn in, Ravi to Supreme Court: ‘Didn’t intend to breach order’

“The Governor conveys that Ponmudi will be invited for swearing in…. The Governor also wishes to convey that he had the least intent to disrespect the order of the court...," Attorney General R Venkataramani told a three-judge bench presided by CJI D Y Chandrachud.

Tamil Nadu Governor R N RaviTamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi Friday told the top court that he had “no intent… to breach” its order. (File photo)

A day after the Supreme Court pulled him up for refusing to swear in DMK MLA K Ponmudi, whose conviction was stayed by it, Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi Friday told the top court that he had “no intent… to breach” its order.

Attorney General R Venkataramani conveyed this to a three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud.

“The Governor conveys that Ponmudi will be invited for swearing in…. The Governor also wishes to convey that he had the least intent to disrespect the order of the court. On a certain understanding of certain judgements of the court, he has taken a view,” the AG told the bench also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

Story continues below this ad

The court recorded this in its order and disposed of the interlocutory application filed by the Tamil Nadu government. “Hence, no further directions are needed on the interlocutory application, save and except to take the assurance on the record,” it said.

Appearing for the TN government, Senior Advocate P Wilson said, “Parliamentary democracy survives because of Your Lordships.”

Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, who also appeared for the state, wondered why it should approach the court every time because of such actions.

The CJI expressed relief at the matter being resolved. “It’s all sorted out,” he observed.

Story continues below this ad

Hours before the scheduled Supreme Court hearing, Governor Ravi had administered the oath of office to Ponmudy, a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) from Tirukoilur. This came a day after the SC came down heavily on Governor Ravi’s interpretations of an SC order staying Ponmudy’s conviction. After the oath ceremony, Chief Minister M K Stalin thanked the SC for upholding the spirit of the Constitution.

“On behalf of the people of Tamil Nadu, I thank the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the custodian of the Constitution, for its timely intervention and upholding the spirit of the Constitution and saving democracy. In the last decade, the people of India witnessed the dithering of democracy, withering of federalism and misadventures to put spikes before the functioning of sovereign governments elected by the people and giving age-old traditions a go by,” Stalin posted online.

Ponmudy, a DMK veteran and former minister, had found himself embroiled in a legal controversy after his conviction by the Madras High Court in a case of disproportionate assets. In December 2023, the court reversed his earlier acquittal and sentenced him to three years of imprisonment, leading to his disqualification from the cabinet post. On March 11, an SC bench comprising Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan stayed the conviction and sentence, paving the way for his return as a legislator. The SC order was on a petition arguing that the HC had wrongly overturned the well-detailed acquittal by the trial court and that the HC erred in clubbing the assets of Ponmudy and his wife to determine the “property disproportionate”.

Soon after the interim relief from SC, Stalin wrote to Ravi to re-induct Ponmudy into the cabinet.

Story continues below this ad

The Governor however refused citing moral and legal grounds. This refusal was rooted in the interpretation of Section 8(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, highlighting the nuanced distinction between a stay of conviction and its complete overturning.

“It means the conviction of Ponmudy, though existent, has been made non-operative. It has not been set aside,” the Governor’s letter to Stalin said. Ravi argued that the offences for which Ponmudy had been held guilty by the HC were very serious, amounting to moral turpitude and relating to corruption he allegedly committed as a public servant. Ravi maintained that the interim relief from SC, staying the conviction, did not erase the conviction entirely.

The case took a turn when the Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, intervened on a petition from the state government. “We are seriously concerned by the governor’s conduct. He is defying the Supreme Court. He has no business to say Ponmudy’s taint continued and that it would constitutionally be immoral to swear him in as minister. Those who have advised him have not advised him correctly in accordance with law. The Governor should be informed that when the Supreme Court of India stays a conviction, the law has to follow its course,” the SC said on Thursday.

Within a day, hours before the SC was to hear the plea again, the Governor sent the communication to the state government informing the time for the oath ceremony of Ponmudy.

Story continues below this ad

The event, held at 3.30 pm, was private, with key state officials and ministers in attendance. Stalin, Ponmudy, ministers Ma Subramanian, P K Sekar Babu, chief secretary Shiv Das Meena, public secretary K Nanthakumar, and chief minister’s secretary N Muruganandam were among those who attended the ceremony at Raj Bhawan.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement