Premium
This is an archive article published on June 17, 2024

‘Bharat’ and ‘India’ to be used interchangeably in textbooks, Constitution upholds both: NCERT director

Saklani asserted that the debate over these words was useless, given that the Constitution upholds both of them.

NCERT textbook, NCERT controversySaklani's remarks come after a high-level panel for social sciences, working to revise the school curriculum, had recommended the replacing of 'India' with 'Bharat' in all textbooks last year. (PTI Photo)

Amid the ongoing row over revised textbooks, National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) Director Dinesh Saklani has said that the words ‘Bharat’ and ‘India’ could be used interchangeably in them.

In an interview with news agency PTI, Saklani asserted that the debate over these words was useless, given that the Constitution upholds both of them. He further added that the NCERT has no aversion to using either ‘Bharat’ or ‘India’ in their textbooks.

“It is interchangeable… our position is what our Constitution says and we uphold that. We can use Bharat, we can use India, what is the problem?” Saklani questioned.

Story continues below this ad

The remarks come after a high-level panel for social sciences, working to revise the school curriculum, had recommended the replacing of ‘India’ with ‘Bharat’ in all textbooks last year.

“The committee has unanimously recommended that the name Bharat should be used in the textbooks for students across classes. Bharat is an age-old name. The name Bharat has been used in ancient texts, such as Vishnu Purana, which is 7,000 years old,” committee chairperson C I Isaac had said in an interview to PTI.

NCERT has been at the midst of a controversy after omissions in its Class 12 Political Science textbook, which hit the market last week. The book carried no mention of the Babri Masjid by name, instead referring to it as a “three-domed structure”, and pruned the Ayodhya section from four to two pages, deleting telling details from the earlier version.

In an interview with The Indian Express on Sunday, Saklani justified the omissions of the Gujarat riots and the violence after the Babri Masjid demolition, stating that an expert committee felt that “mentioning a few selectively is not good”.

Story continues below this ad

Saklani also told The Indian Express that the revisions in the Ayodhya section were based on feedback from experts and were carried out to accommodate the Supreme Court’s 2019 judgment on the dispute.

– With inputs from PTI

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement