skip to content
Advertisement
Premium
This is an archive article published on February 6, 2019

JNU case: Court lashes out at Delhi govt for delaying sanctions to prosecute Kanhaiya, others

The Court has directed the Investigating Officer to ask the Delhi government to expedite the sanction decision. "Authorities cannot sit on files for an indefinite period," the court said and fixed next date of hearing on February 28.

jnu sedition, jnu sedition case, jnu sedition case chargesheet, kanhaiya kumar, jnu students sedition, umar khalid, delhi police, india news, latest news, indian express Former JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar at the JNU campus upon his release on bail (File/PTI Photo/ Kamal Singh)

The Delhi government was slammed by a city court on Wednesday over the delay in granting requisite sanctions to prosecute former JNU Students Union president Kanhaiya Kumar and others in a 2016 sedition case, saying it can’t sit on file indefinitely. “Ask the authorities concerned to expedite the matter. They can’t sit on file for an indefinite period,” the court said.

Posting the matter for February 28, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Deepak Sherawat directed Delhi Police to ask the authorities concerned to expedite the process while grating it three weeks to procure the sanctions needed to prosecute Kumar and other accused, including former Jawaharlal Nehru University students, Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, in the case.

The court had earlier questioned Delhi Police for filing a charge sheet against Kumar and others without procuring the sanctions. “Why did you file (the charge sheet) without approval? You don’t have a legal department,” the court had said. The court had then granted time till today to procure the sanction.  According to official records, police had applied for sanction just two hours before filing the chargesheet on January 14.

Story continues below this ad

The police had chargesheeted Kumar and others, saying he was leading a procession and supported seditious slogans raised on the campus during an event on February 9, 2016. Police also charged Khalid and Bhattacharya for allegedly shouting anti-India slogans during the event to mark the hanging of Parliament-attack mastermind Afzal Guru.

In its chargesheet, the Delhi Police has relied on video footage from six mobile phones, of which at least three belong to current or former members of the ABVP’s JNU unit, and one belongs to a constable.

While there is a lot of speculation around the Delhi government’s position on the issue, The Indian Express was told by authoritative sources that the nature of the case led the Home Department knocking on the door of the Law Department, to seek clarity on what the “guidelines” are.

What made this exchange particularly significant is the fact that the Home Department had to seek guidelines as there is no immediate precedence for it to refer to in charting the course ahead. The Home Department, which controls the Directorate of Prosecution, mentioned in the file that the last precedence of a similar nature dates back to 1982.

 

 

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement