Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Report on Aseemanand sponsored by Cong: BJP
Aseemanand’s lawyer too issued a statement denying that his client had given any interview making such claims to Caravan magazine.

A day after the RSS rejected a report claiming that Aseemanand had said that RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat had blessed and sanctioned a series of bombings from 2006-08, the BJP described the report as a “Congress sponsored” exercise to deflect attention from the UPA’s misgovernance.
Aseemanand’s lawyer too issued a statement denying that his client had given any interview making such claims to Caravan magazine. “I hereby clarify that the contents of the article are false, baseless and concocted. My client denies to have given any such interview. The whole story is a complex work of ill-motivated deliberate designs to malign the reputation of my client,” J S Rana, lawyer for Aseemanand, said in the statement released on Thursday.
“Swami Aseemanand emphatically denies to have had any close door meeting with senior leaders of the alleged social organization in year 2005 or afterward,” the statement said. The BJP termed the allegations a politically motivated design by the Congress. “It is a Congress-sponsored exercise. Congress knows that they have no answers on burning issues like corruption, unemployment, sense of insecurity and price rise, among others. Therefore these diversionary tactics are being deployed by them. This is the third such diversionary attempt, (after) the Prime Minister saying Modi to be disastrous for the country, (and) Sonia Gandhi charging ‘zeher ki kheti’,” BJP deputy leader in Rajya Sabha Ravi Shankar Prasad told reporters on Thursday.
He also doubted the veractiy of the interview, saying that “we are hearing for the first time that an interview has happened over a span of two years”. “This is the work of dirty tricks department before elections,” Prasad said. Aseemanand’s lawyer said the interview was “a clear cut example of a larger conspiracy to interfere in administration of justice and design to violate the human rights and the interests of an undertrial prisoner”, and threatened to “take all legal action” against the magazine.